Ultrasensitive bioanalysis: current status and future trends

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Yalow RS, Berson SA. Immunoassay of endogenous plasma insulin in man. J. Clin. Invest. 39, 1157–1175 (1960).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2 Hawkridge AM, Heublein DM, Bergen HR, Cataliotti A, Burnett JC, Muddiman DC. Quantitative mass spectral evidence for the absence of circulating brain natriuretic peptide (BNP-32) in severe human heart failure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102(48), 17442–17447 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3 Sapin R. Insulin immunoassays: fast approaching 50 years of existence and still calling for standardization. Clin. Chem. 53(5), 810–812 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Sano T, Smith CL, Cantor CR. Immuno-PCR: very sensitive antigen detection by means of specific antibody–DNA conjugates. Science 258(5079), 120–122 (1992).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Piraino F, Volpetti F, Watson C, Maerkl SJ. A digital–analog microfluidic platform for patient-centric multiplexed biomarker diagnostics of ultralow volume samples. ACS Nano 10(1), 1699–1710 (2016). • A review of the potential of microfluidics and digital assays for biomarker diagnostic.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ahn S, Zhang P, Yu H, Lee S, Kang SH. Ultrasensitive detection of α-fetoprotein by total internal reflection scattering-based super-resolution microscopy for superlocalization of nano-immunoplasmonics. Anal. Chem. 88(22), 11070–11076 (2016). •• An extraordinary sensitivity at 10 zM achieved for α-fetoprotein using nanoimmunoplasmonic and microscopy.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 7 Spengler M, Adler M, Jonas A, Niemeyer CM. Immuno-PCR assays for immunogenicity testing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 387(2), 278–282 (2009). • Describes the potential application of immuno-PCR in the evaluation of drug safety through immunogenicity testing.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8 Khan AH, Sadroddiny E. Application of immuno-PCR for the detection of early stage cancer. Mol. Cell. Probes 30(2), 106–112 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9 Fischer SK, Joyce A, Spengler M et al. Emerging technologies to increase ligand binding assay sensitivity. AAPS J. 17(1), 93–101 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Cretich M, Daaboul GG, Sola L, Ünlü MS, Chiari M. Digital detection of biomarkers assisted by nanoparticles: application to diagnostics. Trends Biotechnol. 33(6), 343–351 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11 Anderson NL. The clinical plasma proteome: a survey of clinical assays for proteins in plasma and serum. Clin. Chem. 56(2), 177–185 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 Pavlou MP, Diamandis EP, Blasutig IM. The long journey of cancer biomarkers from the bench to the clinic. Clin. Chem. 59(1), 147–157 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13 Polanski M, Anderson NL. A list of candidate cancer biomarkers for targeted proteomics. Biomark. Insights 1, 1–48 (2007).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14 Rhea JM, Molinaro RJ. Cancer biomarkers: surviving the journey from bench to bedside. MLO Med. Lab. Obs. 43(3), 10–22 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15 Chang L, Li J, Wang L. Immuno-PCR: an ultrasensitive immunoassay for biomolecular detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 910, 12–24 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Sokoll LJ, Zhang Z, Chan DW et al. Do ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen measurements have a role in predicting long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival in men after radical prostatectomy? J. Urol. 195(2), 330–336 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ezan E, Bitsch F. Critical comparison of MS and immunoassays for the bioanalysis of therapeutic antibodies. Bioanalysis 1(8), 1375–1388 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Duriez E, Armengaud J, Fenaille F, Ezan E. Mass spectrometry for the detection of bioterrorism agents: from environmental to clinical applications. J. Mass Spectrom. 51(3), 183–199 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19 Lasne F, de Ceaurriz J. Recombinant erythropoietin in urine. Nature 405(6787), 635 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Grassi J, Créminon C, Frobert Y et al. Two different approaches for developing immunometric assays of haptens. Clin. Chem. 42(9), 1532–1536 (1996). • A description for a sandwich immunoassay for a small-molecular-weight analyte (angiotensin II).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Hashida S, Hashinaka K, Ishikawa E. Ultrasensitive enzyme immunoassay. Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 1, 403–451 (1995).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Volland H, Pradelles P, Taran F, Buscarlet L, Creminon C. Recent developments for SPIE-IA, a new sandwich immunoassay format for very small molecules. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 34(4), 737–752 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 23 Du L, Ji W, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Liu G, Wang S. An ultrasensitive detection of 17β-estradiol using a gold nanoparticle-based fluorescence immunoassay. Analyst 140(6), 2001–2007 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 Huang X, Zhan S, Xu H, Meng X, Xiong Y, Chen X. Ultrasensitive fluorescence immunoassay for detection of ochratoxin A using catalase-mediated fluorescence quenching of CdTe QDs. Nanoscale 8(17), 9390–9397 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25 Jackson TM, Ekins RP. Theoretical limitations on immunoassay sensitivity. Current practice and potential advantages of fluorescent Eu3+ chelates as non-radioisotopic tracers. J. Immunol. Methods 87(1), 13–20 (1986).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F et al. Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230(4732), 1350–1354 (1985).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27 Zhang J, Vernes JM, Ni J et al. Real-time immuno-polymerase chain reaction in a 384-well format: detection of vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor-like domain 7. Anal. Biochem. 463, 61–66 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28 Yin H, Jia M, Shi L et al. Evaluation of a novel ultra-sensitive nanoparticle probe-based assay for ricin detection. J. Immunotoxicol. 11(3), 291–295 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 Jani D, Savino E, Goyal J. Feasibility of immuno-PCR technology platforms as an ultrasensitive tool for the detection of anti-drug antibodies. Bioanalysis 7(3), 285–294 (2015).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Gaudet D, Nilsson D, Lohr T, Sheedy C. Development of a real-time immuno-PCR assay for the quantification of 17β-estradiol in water. J. Environ. Sci. Health B 50(10), 683–690 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 Yang GX, Zhuang HS, Chen HY, Ping XY, Bu D. A sensitive immunosorbent bio-barcode assay based on real-time immuno-PCR for detecting 3,4,3′,4′-tetrachlorobiphenyl. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406(6), 1693–1700 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32 Partyka K, Wang S, Zhao P, Cao B, Haab B. Array-based immunoassays with rolling-circle amplification detection. Methods Mol. Biol. 1105, 3–15 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Wang P, Jin B, Xing Y et al. Rolling circle amplification immunoassay combined with gold nanoparticle aggregates for colorimetric detection of protein. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 14(8), 5662–5668 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Yan J, Hu C, Wang P et al. Novel rolling circle amplification and DNA origami-based DNA belt-involved signal amplification assay for highly sensitive detection of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(22), 20372–20377 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Fredriksson S, Gullberg M, Jarvius J et al. Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nat. Biotechnol. 20(5), 473–477 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 Lundberg M, Eriksson A, Tran B, Assarsson E, Fredriksson S. Homogeneous antibody-based proximity extension assays provide sensitive and specific detection of low-abundant proteins in human blood. Nucleic Acids Res. 39(15), e102 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37 Malhotra R, Patel V, Chikkaveeraiah BV et al. Ultrasensitive detection of cancer biomarkers in the clinic by use of a nanostructured microfluidic array. Anal. Chem. 84(14), 6249–6255 (2012). • A typical example of ultrasensitivity obtained with nanotechnologies.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 Sanders M, Lin Y, Wei J, Bono T, Lindquist RG. An enhanced LSPR fiber-optic nanoprobe for ultrasensitive detection of protein biomarkers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 61, 95–101 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Rong Z, Wang C, Wang J, Wang D, Xiao R, Wang S. Magnetic immunoassay for cancer biomarker detection based on surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering from coupled plasmonic nanostructures. Biosens. Bioelectron. 84, 15–21 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40 Huang X, Xu Z, Mao Y et al. Gold nanoparticle-based dynamic light scattering immunoassay for ultrasensitive detection of Listeria monocytogenes in lettuces. Biosens. Bioelectron. 66, 184–190 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41 Han JH, Sudheendra L, Kim HJ, Gee SJ, Hammock BD, Kennedy IM. Ultrasensitive on-chip immunoassays with a nanoparticle-assembled photonic crystal. ACS Nano 6(10), 8570–8582 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Zhao Y, Cao M, McClelland JF, Shao Z, Lu M. A photoacoustic immunoassay for biomarker detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 85, 261–266 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43 Wen W, Yan X, Zhu C, Du D, Lin Y. Recent advances in electrochemical immunosensors. Anal. Chem. 89(1), 138–156 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44 Gong L, Dai H, Zhang S, Lin Y. Silver iodide–chitosan nanotag induced biocatalytic precipitation for self-enhanced ultrasensitive photocathodic immunosensor. Anal. Chem. 88(11), 5775–5782 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 45 Ge Y, Wu J, Ju H, Wu S. Ultrasensitive enzyme-free electrochemical immunosensor based on hybridization chain reaction triggered double strand DNA@Au nanoparticle tag. Talanta 120, 218–223 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46 Han J, Zhuo Y, Chai Y et al. Ultrasensitive electrochemical strategy for trace detection of APE-1 via triple signal amplification strategy. Biosens. Bioelectron. 41, 116–122 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47 Wang GL, Shu JX, Dong YM, Wu XM, Li ZJ. An ultrasensitive and universal photoelectrochemical immunoassay based on enzyme mimetics enhanced signal amplification. Biosens. Bioelectron. 66, 283–289 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 48 Tong L, Wu J, Li J, Ju H, Yan F. Hybridization chain reaction engineered DNA nanopolylinker for amplified electrochemical sensing of biomarkers. Analyst 138(17), 4870–4876 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 49 Zhong Z, Li M, Qing Y et al. Signal-on electrochemical immunoassay for APE1 using ionic liquid doped Au nanoparticle/graphene as a nanocarrier and alkaline phosphatase as enhancer. Analyst 139(24), 6563–6568 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50 Liu D, Yang J, Wang HF et al. Glucose oxidase-catalyzed growth of gold nanoparticles enables quantitative detection of attomolar cancer biomarkers. Anal. Chem. 86(12), 5800–5806 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51 de la Rica R, Stevens MM. Plasmonic ELISA for the ultrasensitive detection of disease biomarkers with the naked eye. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7(12), 821–824 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52 Lin D, Wu J, Ju H, Yan F. Nanogold/mesoporous carbon foam-mediated silver enhancement for graphene-enhanced electrochemical immunosensing of carcinoembryonic antigen. Biosens. Bioelectron. 52, 153–158 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53 Zhang H, Li W, Sheng Z, Han H, He Q. Ultrasensitive detection of porcine circovirus type 2 using gold(III) enhanced chemiluminescence immunoassay. Analyst 135(7), 1680–1685 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54 Wang H, Li G, Zhang Y et al. Nanobody-based electrochemical immunoassay for ultrasensitive determination of apolipoprotein-A1 using silver nanoparticles loaded nanohydroxyapatite as label. Anal. Chem. 87(22), 11209–11214 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 55 Witters D, Sun B, Begolo S, Rodriguez-Manzano J, Robles W, Ismagilov RF. Digital biology and chemistry. Lab Chip 14(17), 3225–3232 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56 Zhang Y, Noji H. Digital bioassays: theory, applications, and perspectives. Anal. Chem. 89(1), 92–101 (2017). •• An exhaustive review of digital assays.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57 Rissin DM, Kan CW, Campbell TG et al. Single-molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detects serum proteins at subfemtomolar concentrations. Nat. Biotechnol. 28(6), 595–599 (2010). •• The first experimental paper describing the digital single-molecule enzyme-linked immunoassay technology.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 58 Chang L, Rissin DM, Fournier DR et al. Single molecule enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays: theoretical considerations. J. Immunol. Methods 378(1–2), 102–115 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 59 Schubert SM, Arendt LM, Zhou W et al. Ultra-sensitive protein detection via single molecule arrays towards early stage cancer monitoring. Sci. Rep. 5, 11034 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 60 Song L, Lachno DR, Hanlon D et al. A digital enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for ultrasensitive measurement of amyloid-β 1–42 peptide in human plasma with utility for studies of Alzheimer’s disease therapeutics. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 8(1), 58 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 61 Pleil JD, Angrish MM, Madden MC. Immunochemistry for high-throughput screening of human exhaled breath condensate (EBC) media: implementation of automated Quanterix SIMOA instrumentation. J. Breath Res. 9(4), 47108 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• 62 Leirs K, Tewari Kumar P, Decrop D et al. Bioassay development for ultrasensitive detection of influenza a nucleoprotein using digital ELISA. Anal. Chem. 88(17), 8450–8458 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 63 Gaylord ST, Abdul-Aziz S, Walt DR. Single-molecule arrays for ultrasensitive detection of host immune response to dengue virus infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53(5), 1722–1724 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 64 Wilson DH, Rissin DM, Kan CW et al. The Simoa HD-1 analyzer: a novel fully automated digital immunoassay analyzer with single-molecule sensitivity and multiplexing. J. Lab. Autom. 21(4), 533–547 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 65 Gilbert M, Livingston R, Felberg J, Bishop JJ. Multiplex single molecule counting technology used to generate interleukin 4, interleukin 6, and interleukin 10 reference limits. Anal. Biochem. 503, 11–20 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 66 Yang T, O’Malley TT, Kanmert D et al. A highly sensitive novel immunoassay specifically detects low levels of soluble Aβ oligomers in human cerebrospinal fluid. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 7(1), 14 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 67 Schultze AE, Anderson JM, Kern TG et al. Longitudinal studies of cardiac troponin I concentrations in serum from male cynomolgus monkeys: resting values and effects of oral and intravenous dosing on biologic variability. Vet. Clin. Pathol. 44(3), 465–471 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 68 Yeung D, Ciotti S, Purushothama S et al. Evaluation of highly sensitive immunoassay technologies for quantitative measurements of sub-pg/ml levels of cytokines in human serum. J. Immunol. Methods 437, 53–63 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69 Yang CT, Wu L, Liu X et al. Exploiting surface-plasmon-enhanced light scattering for the design of ultrasensitive biosensing modality. Anal. Chem. 88(23), 11924–11930 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 70 Dudal S, Baltrukonis D, Crisino R et al. Assay formats: recommendation for best practices and harmonization from the global bioanalysis consortium harmonization team. AAPS J. 16(2), 194–205 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 71 Macaulay IC, Ponting CP, Voet T. Single-cell multiomics: multiple measurements from single cells. Trends Genet. 33(2), 155–168 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 72 Rebelo TSCR, Noronha JP, Galésio M et al. Testing the variability of PSA expression by different human prostate cancer cell lines by means of a new potentiometric device employing molecularly antibody assembled on graphene surface. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 59, 1069–1078 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar