We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
ReportsOpen Accesscc iconby iconnc iconnd icon

Overlap extension cloning of PCR products into a Gateway-compatible plasmid vector

    Omid Zare-Mehrjerdi

    Illinois State University, School of Biological Sciences, Normal, IL 61790-4120, USA

    ,
    Gracie Trader

    Illinois State University, School of Biological Sciences, Normal, IL 61790-4120, USA

    &
    Viktor Kirik

    *Author for correspondence:

    E-mail Address: vmkirik@ilstu.edu

    Illinois State University, School of Biological Sciences, Normal, IL 61790-4120, USA

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2023-0001

    Abstract

    A PCR cloning method that combines a dual selection pGATE-1 plasmid vector and an improved overlap extension cloning was developed. This efficient and cost-effective method allows for the introduction of DNA fragments into the Gateway cloning pipeline. The cloning efficiency is facilitated by a dual selection that includes the ccdB gene and gentamicin resistance. For users of the Gateway cloning system, substantial cost saving comes from eliminating BP recombination and ligation reactions to introduce DNA fragments into pDONR or pENTR vectors. Beyond the Gateway technology, this recombination-based cloning system can be used to efficiently clone PCR amplicons by adding 24-base pair adaptor sequences that are utilized by bacterial homologous recombination mechanism.

    METHOD SUMMARY

    For overlap extension cloning of PCR products into the pGATE-1 vector, a DNA fragment of interest is amplified using primers with adaptor oligonucleotide sequences complementary to the pGATE-1 dual-selection plasmid. The resulting PCR product is used as a megaprimer in the optimized overlap extension reaction to replace the ccdB negative selection gene in the Gateway cassette of pGATE-1. The product of the overlap extension reaction is used directly for transformation into bacteria.

    DNA cloning is a basic step in recombinant DNA technology where a DNA sequence of interest is inserted into a suitable vector, usually a plasmid. The traditional “cut-and-paste” DNA cloning techniques use restriction enzymes, DNA ligase, and other enzymatic reaction and purification steps that are time-consuming and cost-inefficient [1,2]. More recently developed restriction-free cloning techniques have significantly streamlined the procedure. Among them, PCR-mediated cloning [3–7] and recombinase-dependent cloning [3,4,8,9] have become widely established.

    PCR-mediated cloning approaches allow inserting a DNA fragment into any position of a vector, maintaining the directionality of the insert, and can be performed without sequence constraints [3,5–7,10,11]. The amplicon is inserted into a specific site of the vector in the process of PCR amplification. Overlap extension PCR cloning is a type of PCR-mediated cloning approach where DNA fragment is amplified in PCR reaction using chimeric primers containing insert-specific and adapter regions [4–7,10,11]. The adapter regions share homology with sites on the target cloning vector, ensuring directionality and insertion into a specific site. Due to the homology between flanking adaptor regions and target vectors, the amplified insert acts as a megaprimer during the subsequent linear amplification reaction [3–5,10,11]. The resulting recombined DNA product is directly transformed into competent E. coli bacteria which repair single-stranded nicks in the circular DNA. This simple and efficient technique can be used for large-scale cloning projects.

    The Gateway™ system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) is an example of recombinase-dependent cloning. It uses the bacteriophage lambda site-specific recombination to “shuttle” a gene of interest into a plasmid vector [1,12–15]. A DNA fragment can be introduced into the Gateway cloning system either by ligation into pENTR™ plasmids or by the BP recombination reaction into pDONR™ vectors. The latter approach requires adding BP recombinase recognition sites to amplification primers. The selection for recombinant plasmids is aided by removing the negative slection ccdB gene [16] present in the Gateway cassette. Although this cloning system is highly efficient, it has several limitations, including restricted choice of pENTR™ plasmids with different antibiotic selections and the high cost of proprietary recombinase enzymes and cloning vectors.

    A restriction-free PCR cloning system that utilizes ccdB gene replacement and gentamicin resistance dual selection in a new entry vector pGATE-1 is introduced here. A modification of the overlap extension PCR-mediated cloning allows for efficient and cost-effective insertion of a DNA amplicon into the Gateway system that bypasses BP and ligase reactions. The applicability of the cloning technique expands beyond the Gateway system and can be used to efficiently clone any PCR product using the dual-selection system.

    Materials & methods

    Construction of the pGATE-1 entry vector

    To expand the available suite of the Gateway system entry vectors a new entry vector, pGATE-1, that has gentamicin resistance was constructed. The TRM13 (AT2G45900) gene that was cloned previously into pDONR207 was replaced with a Gateway cassette containing the chloramphenicol resistance gene and ccdB gene. The chimeric primers used for amplification of the Gateway™ cassette from the pDONR207 were designed with the molecular sequence analysis software Vector NTI [17,18]; Thermo Fisher Scientific): ccdB attL1 F (5′-AAG TTT GTA CAA AAA AGC AGG TCG ACC GAC AGC CTT CCA AAT G-3′) and ccdB attL2 R (5′-CAC TTT GTA CAA GAA AGC TGG TCG ACT AAG TTG GCA GCA TC-3′). The primers are complementary to the Gateway cassette flanking region (shown in bold; underlined are the SalI recognition sites) and to attL1 and attL2 seqyences. The resulting 2036-base pair (bp) PCR product was used as a megaprimer (henceforth referred to as the GATE1 megaprimer) in the overlap extension step described below. Next, the pDONR207-attL vector backbone with attL sites was amplified using primers complementary to the pDONR207-TRM13 plasmid backbone pENTR-OMG V F (5′-GTC GAC CAG CTT TCT TGT ACA AAG TGG GCA TTA TAA G-3′) and pENTR-OMG V R (5′-GTC GAC CTG CTT TTT TGT ACA AAC TTG GCA TTA TAA AAA AG-3′).

    To combine the resulting PCR fragments, an overlap extension cloning method was used essentially as described in previous reports [4] with minor modifications. The GATE-1 megaprimer was used as an insert and the amplified pDONR207-attL backbone was used as a template. The linear amplification took place in 10x Taq buffer using 75 ng of vector backbone with a 3:1 megaprimer-to-vector molar ratio, 0.4U Taq DNA polymerase (Midsci, MO, USA; #BETAQ-5000) and 0.5U Phusion DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs, MA, USA; #M0530L) in 30 μl total volume. The mixture was heated to 98°C for 60 s for initial denaturation, followed by 25 cycles of 10 s denaturation at 98°C, 30 s of annealing using touchdown from 65° to 54°C and 150 s of elongation at 72°C terminated by a final 120 s elongation step at 72°C. The endonuclease DpnI (10 U; New England BioLabs) was added to the reaction and left to incubate at room temperature overnight. DpnI digestion was heat-inactivated by heating to 80°C for 20 min.

    The product of the overlap extension reaction was transformed into the E. coli strain DB3.1 and selected on gentamicin (10 mg/l) and chloramphenicol (25 mg/l) antibiotics. Isolated pGATE-1 plasmids were verified by restriction digestion and sequencing.

    Verification of pGATE-1 functionality & improving efficiency of the overlap extension PCR cloning

    To check the functionality of pGATE-1 in cloning a PCR amplified DNA fragment, primers were designed to clone the FOP gene (National Center for Biotechnology Information reference sequence: NC_000012): FOP Ins F (5′-GTT TGT ACA AAA AAG CAG GTC GACATG GCG GCG ACG GCG G-3′) and FOP Ins R (5′-CTT TGT ACA AGA AAG CTG GTC GACCTA TGC AAC ATC TTC CAG ATA ATC CGC-3′) with italicized nucleotides complementary to the pGATE-1 backbone followed by the FOP gene-specific region shown in bold. The SalI sites flanking the insert are underlined. The FOP megaprimer was amplified in the PCR-1 reaction with 5x Phusion HF buffer (New England BioLabs; #M0530L), 200 μM dNTP (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 0.5 μM of both primers FOP Ins F and FOP Ins R, 0.6U of Phusion DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs; #M0530L) and 75 ng of FOP/pCACT2 template plasmid DNA in 30 μl total volume. The samples were denatured at 98°C for 60 s, followed by 25 cycles of 10 s denaturation at 98°C, 30 s annealing at 66°C and 60 s elongation at 72°C; the final extension step was 120 s elongation at 72°C. The PCR product was used directly in the subsequent overlap extension reaction without purification. Overlap extension cloning was used to swap the Gateway cassette in pGATE-1 with the FOP megaprimer. Four different modifications of the overlap extension reaction (PCR-2) were tested to improve cloning efficiency.

    Reaction 1 conditions

    DNA polymerase mix with touchdown. Linear amplification took place in 10x Taq buffer (Midsci, MO, USA; #BETAQ-5000), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM dNTP, 1.0U Taq DNA polymerase (Midsci; #BETAQ-5000) and 0.4U Phusion DNA polymerase using 25 ng of pGATE-1 vector and a 20:1 megaprimer-to-vector molar ratio. Nuclease-free water was added to bring the total reaction volume to 30 μl. The mixture was heated to 98°C for 30 s for initial denaturation, followed by 30 cycles of 10 s denaturation at 98°C, 30 s annealing using touchdown from 70° to 60°C and 150 s of elongation at 72°C. The reaction was terminated by a final 120-s elongation step at 72°C.

    Reaction 2 conditions

    DNA polymerase mix without touchdown. The mixture (as in Reaction 1) was heated to 98°C for 60 s for initial denaturation, followed by 30 cycles of 10 s denaturation at 98°C, 30 s annealing at 63°C and 150 s of elongation at 72°C. The reaction was terminated by a final 120-s elongation step at 72°C.

    Reaction 3 conditions

    Phusion DNA polymerase with touchdown. Linear amplification took place in 5x Phusion buffer using 25 ng of vector backbone with a 20:1 megaprimer-to-vector molar ratio and 0.6U Phusion DNA polymerase. Nuclease-free water was added to bring the total reaction volume to 30 μl. The PCR cycle parameters were as in Reaction 1.

    Reaction 4 conditions

    Phusion DNA polymerase without touchdown. The PCR mixture and cycle parameters were as in Reaction 2. The unpurified products of the overlap extension reactions (PCR-2) were used for transformation into the chemically competent DH5α E. coli strain.

     Transformed bacteria were plated on LB agar plates containing gentamicin (10 mg/l) and incubated at 37°C overnight. Individual colonies were inoculated in liquid LB media with gentamicin, and plasmids were purified using the IBI Hi-Speed Mini Plasmid Kit (IBI Scientific, IA, USA; #IB47101). FOP/pGATE-1 plasmids were tested by PCR, restriction digest and sequencing. The functionality of the FOP/pGATE-1 plasmid was verified in the Gateway LR reaction (Thermo Fisher Scientific; LR Clonase™ II) with the pCD2 destination vector. The resulting plasmids were tested by restriction digestion, confirming a successful LR reaction and the functionality of pGATE-1 as an entry vector for Gateway cloning.

    Upon publication, the pGATE-1 plasmid will be made available through Addgene (https://www.addgene.org/). The finalized pGATE-1 cloning method with optimized overlap extension conditions is shown in Supplementary Figure 1.

    Results & discussion

    Construction of the pGATE-1 vector for cloning PCR products

    The pGATE-1 plasmid is a 5313-bp entry vector designed for the introduction of PCR fragments into the Gateway cloning system. The ccdB gene allows for negative selection and the gentamicin resistance gene allows for positive selection following bacterial transformation. Most commercially available pENTR™ vectors use kanamycin selection, limiting flexibility when working with kanamycin-resistant destination vectors. The pGATE-1 vector offers additional flexibility in cloning PCR fragments into Gateway-compatible vectors.

    pGATE-1 was constructed using a modification of the overlap extension PCR cloning technique involving two PCR amplification steps [5,10,11]. PCR-1 amplified the Gateway cassette of pDONR207 flanked by added attL sites. The amplicon from the PCR-1 reaction containing the ccdB cassette served as a megaprimer during the overlap extension (PCR-2) reaction. The resulting pGATE-1 entry vector contained the Gateway cassette between attL sites (Figure 1).

    Figure 1. pGATE-1 is a 5313-bp entry vector compatible with Gateway cloning system.

    Contains ccdB gene for negative selection, gentamicin resistance gene and attL sites that can be used for subsequent LR reactions.

    Insertion of DNA fragments into pGATE-1 vector by the overlap extension PCR cloning with improved efficiency

    To test the functionality of pGATE-1 as a cloning vector, we used a modified overlap extension technique to introduce the FOP gene into pGATE-1 (Figure 2). In this technique, the principle of gene replacement [19] is used to swap the ccdB-containing region in pGATE-1 with the desired PCR fragment. The FOP gene was PCR-amplified with chimeric primers in which the 3′ ends were complementary to the FOP gene and the 5′ ends were complementary to the attL sites flanking the Gateway cassette in pGATE-1 (Figure 3).

    Figure 2. Overlap extension PCR cloning into pGATE-1 plasmid.

    The gene of interest is amplified with primers that add flanking sequences complementary to the pGATE-1 plasmid. Homologous flanking sequences allow the amplicon to act as a megaprimer during PCR-2. In the cloning reaction, the amplicon replaces the Gateway cassette in pGATE1 forming a circularized plasmid with two single-stranded nicks which are repaired in bacteria following transformation.

    Figure 3. Primer design.

    Each primer contains 24 bp of adaptor sequence complementary to pGATE-1. For general cloning of any PCR product (top), this should be followed by 16–24 bp of gene-specific sequence. For fusion to an N- or C-terminal tag in a gateway destination vector, the forward primer must contain two additional nucleotides and the reverse primer must contain one additional nucleotide between the adaptor and gene-specific sequences (red arrows). Note that oligonucleotide sequences correspond to the sense DNA strand of the resulting PCR product (megaprimer).

    To optimize the cloning procedure, we tested different parameters of the overlap extension PCR [4] resulting in a modified protocol with improved efficiency. Four different PCR modifications were used in the PCR-2 step. Reaction 1 conditions had mixed polymerases with touchdown; Reaction 2 conditions had mixed polymerases without touchdown; Reaction 3 conditions had Phusion DNA polymerase only with touchdown; and Reaction 4 conditions had Phusion DNA polymerase without touchdown. Due to the presence of the ccdB negative selection marker in the Gateway cassette, the DpnI digest was not performed either after PCR-1 nor after PCR-2

    Following transformation of equal volumes of PCR-2 products, Reaction 1 conditions resulted in the highest number of bacterial colonies. There were 309 colonies for Reaction 1 and 51 colonies for Reaction 2. Reaction 3 (Phusion polymerase with touchdown) and Reaction 4 (Phusion polymerase without touchdown) produced no colonies (Table 1, Experiment 1). Ten colonies from Reaction 1 and Reaction 2 plates were used for plasmid isolation and PCR verification for the presence of the FOP gene. For both Reaction 1 and Reaction 2 conditions, all ten colonies contained plasmids with the FOP gene (Figure 4).

    Table 1. Optimization of overlap extension PCR cloning parameters.
    Experiment 1
    PolymeraseTouchdownPCR cleanupPositive/total screened clones (PCR)Transformants
    Mixed (Taq and Phusion)YesNo10/10309
    Mixed (Taq and Phusion)NoNo10/1051
    Phusion onlyYesNo00
    Phusion onlyNoNo00
    Experiment 2
    PolymeraseTouchdownPCR cleanupPositive/total screened clones (PCR)Transformants
    Mixed (Taq and Phusion)YesYes10/1098
    Mixed (Taq and Phusion)YesNo10/1028
    Experiment 3
    PolymeraseTouchdownPCR cleanupPositive/total screened clones (PCR)Positive/total screened clones (restriction digest)
    Mixed (Taq and Phusion)YesNo13/133/13

    Experiment 1 compares effects of different polymerases and touchdown conditions in PCR-2 on cloning efficiency. Experiment 2 tests effect of PCR purification of PCR-1 product. Experiment 3 tests efficacy of modified PCR extension cloning technique when the same antibiotic resistance was used in source and target plasmids. Positive/total screened clones (PCR) is the number of samples tested for the FOP gene using PCR. Positive/total screened clones (restriction digest) is the number of samples tested with restriction digestion for presence of FOP/pGATE-1 vector vs FOP/pDONR207 vector.

    Figure 4. PCR test for presence of FOP gene in pGATE-1 plasmid.

    (A) Reaction 1 (mixed polymerase with touchdown) cloning product. (B) Reaction 2 (mixed polymerase without touchdown) cloning product. Numbers indicate independent bacterial colonies tested. (+) is positive control, FOP template plasmid. (-) is negative control, pDONR207. Expected band ∼1.1 kb. DNA ladder is lambda DNA/PstI.

    These findings are consistent with other reports on the touchdown method improving both specificity and yield of PCR amplification [20,21]. Although other reports successfully used overlap extension PCR cloning using Phusion polymerase [4,10], and we used it for the construction of the pGATE-1 plasmid (albeit with a low number of positive colonies), we were able to successfully clone the FOP gene into pGATE-1 only when a blend of a nonproofreading Taq and Phusion polymerase was used. A combination of two factors provides a likely explanation for this result. First, the difference in competent cells' efficiency may explain the presence of positive bacterial colonies in the other reports and their absence in this study. In our experiments, self-prepared competent cells with an efficiency of about 107 CFU/μg were used, compared with 109 CFU/μg efficiency typically found in commercially available competent cells. Second, the blend of a nonproofreading Taq and Phusion polymerases is likely more efficient in the PCR-2 reaction than the Phusion polymerase alone. The large size of the megaprimer (up to 2036 bp in this study) would favor the formation of the primer–primer duplex over the primer–template duplex. Noteworthy, the Phusion polymerase was reported to be inefficient in PCR reactions with primer overlapping more than 28 bp [22]. It was suggested that the intrinsic nature of different polymerases is responsible for their differential ability to use primers with varying degrees of overlap [22]. Combining nonproofreading Taq and Phusion polymerases may have increased the primer–template duplex template formation resulting in a more efficient amplification.

    In a separate experiment, we compared the effect of PCR cleanup following PCR-1 on the cloning efficiency. PCR-2 was performed on two PCR-1 samples amplified using Reaction 1 conditions (mixed polymerase with touchdown) with one sample subjected to PCR cleanup (GeneJET PCR purification kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The PCR-1 purified sample produced 98 colonies while the unpurified sample produced 28 colonies (Table 1, Experiment 2). Ten colonies were selected from each plate and tested with PCR for the presence of the FOP gene. In both cases, ten out of ten colonies tested positive for FOP. This indicated that cloning efficiency was moderately improved by including a PCR cleanup step; however, it can be omitted to save time without sacrificing the ratio of positive cloning events.

    Both Gateway and conventional ligation-mediated cloning are facilitated by using the source and target plasmids with different antibiotic resistance. The unrecombined source plasmids often cause high background, making it nearly impossible to identify recombined plasmids with a cloned fragment. Although there are different ways to circumvent this problem, they involve time-consuming enzymatic and purification steps. For example, in Gateway LR reactions using plasmids with the same resistance, the entry plasmid must be linearized with restriction digestion followed by DNA purification. Besides the time and labor involved, this approach is limited to DNA fragments that do not contain restriction sites used for the linearization of the vector backbone. Here we tested if PCR extension cloning into the pGATE-1 can be used to clone DNA fragments from plasmids with the same resistance as the target vector (gentamicin). The FOP gene was amplified from pDONR207 and inserted into pGATE-1 following the described technique. Thirteen colonies were tested with PCR to identify the presence of the FOP gene and all contained the FOP gene. DNA restriction analysis was performed to differentiate between FOP/pDONR207 and FOP/pGATE-1 plasmids. It showed that 3 out of 13 plasmids contained the FOP gene in pGATE-1 (Table 1, Experiment 3). The 23% success rate makes this technique feasible for subcloning DNA fragments into vectors with the same antibiotic resistance without additional enzymatic and purification steps.

    In a functionality test, the FOP/pGATE-1 plasmid was used successfully in the Gateway LR reaction indicating that pGATE-1 can function as an entry clone in the Gateway system.

    Conclusion

    The combination of an improved overlap extension PCR method and novel pGATE-1 cloning vector is an efficient and cost-effective molecular cloning system for introducing DNA fragments into the Gateway cloning pipeline. It does not rely on the Gateway BP reaction for PCR product cloning, eliminating the need for the costly BP recombinase enzyme. Beyond use in the Gateway system, cloning into pGATE-1 is universally applicable to insert any PCR product into the plasmid vector simply by adding 24 bp of pGATE-1 complementary sequences to specific primers. It is a ligation-free cloning system that does not require DNA purification and plasmid backbone preparations. This highly efficient cloning system benefits from dual selection and can also be used for subcloning of DNA fragments where both source and target plasmids have the same antibiotic resistance without additional DNA manipulations.

    Future perspective

    This study provides researchers with a simple and cost-efficient DNA cloning technique. The described optimized overlap extension technique can be potentially adapted for Gateway destination vectors, eliminating the need and associated costs of the Gateway LR reaction. Indeed, a similar protocol was successfully used for inserting a gene into a destination vector [10]. However, this approach has limited applicability due to the larger size of destination vectors requiring more elaborate techniques such as long-distance PCR or Gibson assembly. Although the described cloning method is highly efficient, the number of positive cloning events can be further improved by using Exponential Megapriming PCR [7] at the overlap extension step. Beyond the Gateway system, the pGATE-1 plasmid and the modified overlap extension protocol can be used to clone PCR products for ligation-mediated subcloning simply by adding restriction enzyme recognition sites to PCR-1 primers between the 24-bp adaptor and gene-specific sequences. The simplicity and high efficiency of the described cloning system make it feasible in high-throughput cloning technologies.

    Executive summary
    • A novel PCR cloning system that combines a dual-selection pGATE-1 plasmid vector and improved overlap extension cloning was described.

    Materials & methods

    • A new vector pGATE-1 was developed for cloning PCR products.

    • The dual-selection pGATE-1 plasmid includes the ccdB gene and gentamicin resistance.

    • The PCR-1 product is amplified with primers containing 24-bp adaptor sequence commentary to pGATE-1.

    • The 5′-GTT TGT ACA AAA AAG CAG GTC GAC NN sequence is added to the forward primer and the 5′-CTT TGT ACA AGA AAG CTG GTC GAC N sequence is added to the reverse primer. Additional N nucleotides (in bold) must be correspondently added for in-frame fusions with N- or C-terminal tags in Gateway destination vectors.

    • The PCR-1 product is used as a megaprimer in the optimized overlap extension reaction (PCR-2) to replace the ccdB negative selection gene in the Gateway cassette of the pGATE-1.

    Results & discussion

    • The PCR-1 product is introduced into the pGATE-1 with the optimized high-efficiency overlap extension PCR cloning technique.

    • Cloning efficiency is improved 3.5 times by including a PCR cleanup step of the PCR-1 product; however, it can be omitted to save time without sacrificing the ratio of positive cloning events.

    • The efficiency of the cloning is increased 6 times by using touchdown PCR conditions in the PCR-2 reaction.

    • This technique is feasible for subcloning DNA fragments from a vector with the same antibiotic resistance (gentamicin) without additional enzymatic and purification steps.

    • The product of the PCR-2 reaction is used directly in bacterial transformation.

    Conclusion

    • A combination of the improved overlap extension PCR method and the novel pGATE-1 cloning vector provides an efficient and cost-effective molecular cloning system for introducing DNA fragments into the Gateway cloning pipeline.

    • Beyond the use in the Gateway system, cloning into pGATE-1 is universally applicable to insert any PCR product into the plasmid vector.

    Supplementary data

    To view the supplementary data that accompany this paper please visit the journal website at: www.future-science.com/doi/suppl/10.2144/btn-2023-0001

    Author contributions

    V Kirik and O Zare-Mehrjerdi designed the research and wrote the paper. O Zare-Mehrjerdi and G Trader performed the research.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank Sam McCoy and Trevor Rickerd for discussions and practical help at different steps of this work.

    Financial & competing interests disclosure

    This work was supported by the R15GM137247 grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health to V Kirik. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

    No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

    Open access

    This work is licensed under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

    References

    • 1. El Qaidi S, Hardwidge PR. ABC cloning: an efficient, simple, and rapid restriction/ligase-free method. MethodsX 6, 316–321 (2019).
    • 2. Cao L, Zhou Y, Huang L, Dong S, Ma Y. Development of a dual-expression vector facilitated with selection-free PCR recombination cloning strategy. AMB Express 7(1), 98 (2017).
    • 3. van den Ent F, Löwe J. RF cloning: a restriction-free method for inserting target genes into plasmids. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 67(1), 67–74 (2006). • This study provides one of the first descriptions of PCR-based (restriction-free) cloning.
    • 4. Bryksin AV, Matsumura I. Overlap extension PCR cloning: a simple and reliable way to create recombinant plasmids. BioTechniques 48(6), 463–465 (2010). •• The overlap extension PCR technique using chimeric primers in the first PCR and a megaprimer in the second PCR is presented in this study. DpnI digestion was used to degrade the original plasmid templates.
    • 5. Guo W, Xie B, Jiang M, Zhu X-J, Qiu M, Dai Z-M. An improved overlap extension PCR for simultaneous multiple sites large fragments insertion, deletion and substitution. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 15637 (2019).
    • 6. Horton RM, Cai Z, Ho SN, Pease LR. Gene splicing by overlap extension: tailor-made genes using the polymerase chain reaction. BioTechniques 54(3), 129–133 (2013).
    • 7. Ulrich A, Andersen KR, Schwartz TU. Exponential megapriming PCR (EMP) cloning – seamless DNA insertion into any target plasmid without sequence constraints. PLOS ONE 7(12), e53360 (2012).
    • 8. Cheo DL, Titus SA, Byrd DRN, Hartley JL, Temple GF, Brasch MA. Concerted assembly and cloning of multiple DNA segments using in vitro site-specific recombination: functional analysis of multi-segment expression clones. Genome Res. 14(10b), 2111–2120 (2004).
    • 9. Fu C, Wehr DR, Edwards J, Hauge B. Rapid one-step recombinational cloning. Nucleic Acids Res. 36(9), e54 (2008).
    • 10. Lund BA, Leiros H-KS, Bjerga GK. A high-throughput, restriction-free cloning and screening strategy based on ccdB-gene replacement. Microb. Cell Factories 13(1), 38 (2014). •• This study reports PCR-based cloning using ccdB gene replacement to insert a gene of interest into a Gateway destination vector bypassing the LR reaction.
    • 11. Hilgarth RS, Lanigan TM. Optimization of overlap extension PCR for efficient transgene construction. MethodsX 7, 100759 (2020).
    • 12. Katzen F. Gateway® recombinational cloning: a biological operating system. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2(4), 571–589 (2007).
    • 13. Reece-Hoyes JS, Walhout AJM. Gateway recombinational cloning. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2018(1), pdb.top094912 (2018).
    • 14. Chiew Foan Chin JYC. Gateway cloning technology: advantages and drawbacks. Cloning Transgenesis 4(1), (2015). www.omicsgroup.org/journals/gateway-cloning-technology-advantages-and-drawbacks-2168-9849-1000138.php?aid=56927
    • 15. Karimi M, Depicker A, Hilson P. Recombinational cloning with plant Gateway vectors. Plant Physiol. 145(4), 1144–1154 (2007).
    • 16. Bernard P. Positive selection of recombinant DNA by CcdB. BioTechniques 21(2), 320–323 (1996).
    • 17. Lu G, Moriyama EN. Vector NTI, a balanced all-in-one sequence analysis suite. Brief. Bioinform. 5(4), 378–388 (2004).
    • 18. Wessner DR, Suite VN. Planning plasmids. Science 286(5444), 1495–1496 (1999).
    • 19. Unger T, Jacobovitch Y, Dantes A, Bernheim R, Peleg Y. Applications of the restriction free (RF) cloning procedure for molecular manipulations and protein expression. J. Struct. Biol. 172(1), 34–44 (2010).
    • 20. Hecker KH, Roux KH. High and low annealing temperatures increase both specificity and yield in touchdown and stepdown PCR. BioTechniques 20(3), 478–485 (1996).
    • 21. Korbie DJ, Mattick JS. Touchdown PCR for increased specificity and sensitivity in PCR amplification. Nat. Protoc. 3(9), 1452–1456 (2008).
    • 22. Xia Y, Chu W, Qi Q, Xun L. New insights into the QuikChange™ process guide the use of Phusion DNA polymerase for site-directed mutagenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 43(2), e12 (2015).