We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×

Evaluation of two point of care technologies for measuring monoclonal antibody therapeutic-A concentrations in blood

    Saloumeh K Fischer

    *Author for correspondence: Tel.: +650-225-4153;

    E-mail Address: sallyk@gene.com

    Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA

    ,
    Kathi Williams

    Genentech Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA

    ,
    Ian Harmon

    Qorvo Biotechnologies Corp., 14505 21st Ave N, Ste 212, Plymouth, MN 55447, USA

    ,
    Bryan Bothwell

    Qorvo Biotechnologies Corp., 14505 21st Ave N, Ste 212, Plymouth, MN 55447, USA

    ,
    Hua Xu

    Proxim Diagnostics Corp., 2065 Martin Ave Ste 101, Santa Clara, CA 95050, USA

    ,
    Emmanuel Capio

    Proxim Diagnostics Corp., 2065 Martin Ave Ste 101, Santa Clara, CA 95050, USA

    &
    Mikhail Briman

    Proxim Diagnostics Corp., 2065 Martin Ave Ste 101, Santa Clara, CA 95050, USA

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2020-0193

    Aim: Current blood monitoring methods require sample collection and testing at a central lab, which can take days. Point of care (POC) devices with quick turnaround time can provide an alternative with faster results, allowing for real-time data leading to better treatment decisions for patients. Results/Methodology: An assay to measure monoclonal antibody therapeutic-A was developed on two POC devices. Data generated using 75 serum samples (65 clinical & ten spiked samples) show correlative results to the data generated using Gyrolab technology. Conclusion: This case study uses a monoclonal antibody therapeutic-A concentration assay as an example to demonstrate the potential of POC technologies as a viable alternative to central lab testing with quick results allowing for real-time decision-making.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

    References

    • 1. King K, Grazette LP, Paltoo DN et al. Point-of-care technologies for precision cardiovascular care and clinical research: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 1(1–2), 73–86 (2016). •• Review of the state of the point-of-care (POC) technologies field.
    • 2. Olansky L, Kennedy L. Finger-stick glucose monitoring: issues of accuracy and specificity. Diabetes Care 33(4), 948–949 (2010).
    • 3. Hudson MP, Christenson RH, Newby LK, Kaplan AL, Ohman EM. Cardiac markers: point of care testing. Clin. Chim. Acta 284(2), 223–237 (1999).
    • 4. Colombel JF, Feagan BG, Sandborn WJ, Van Assche G, Robinson AM. Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics for inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 18(2), 349–358 (2012).
    • 5. Ghiculescu RA. Therapeutic drug monitoring: which drugs, why, when and how to do it. Australian Prescriber 31(2), 42–44 (2008). • Monitoring of therapeutic drugs and its role in individualized dosage.
    • 6. Kim HY, Martin JH, Mclachlan AJ, Boddy AV. Precision dosing of targeted anticancer drugs – challenges in the real world. Translational Cancer Res. S1500–S1511 (2017).
    • 7. Rocha C, Afonso J, Lago P et al. Accuracy of the new rapid test for monitoring adalimumab levels. Therap. Adv. Gastroenterol. 12, 1–11 (2019).
    • 8. Strik AS, Wang Y-MC, Ruff LE, Yashar W, Messmer BT, Mould DR. Individualized dosing of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies – a changingtreatment paradigm? AAPS J. 20(6), 99–108 (2018). •• Review of POC technologies, Drug monitoring and safety issues.
    • 9. Abbott Newsroom. Detect COVID-19 in as Little as 5 Minutes (2020). https://www.abbott.com/corpnewsroom/product-and-innovation/detect-covid-19-in-as-little-as-5-minutes.html
    • 10. Fischer SK. Point-of-care and utility in clinical trials: making quicker decisions to transform patient care and drug development. Bioanalysis 12(15), 1039–1041 (2020).
    • 11. Fischer SK, Williams K, Wang L, Capio E, Briman M. Development of an IL-6 point-of-care assay: utility for real-time monitoring and management of cytokine release syndrome and sepsis. Bioanalysis 11(19), 1777–1785 (2019). • POC assay for IL-6 for monitoring cytokine release syndrome and sepsis.
    • 12. Feuerstein JD, Nguyen GC, Kupfer SS, Falck-Ytter Y, Singh S, American Gastroenterological Association Institute Clinical Guidelines C. American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on therapeutic drug monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 153(3), 827–834 (2017).
    • 13. Maser EA, Villela R, Silverberg MS, Greenberg GR. Association of trough serum infliximab to clinical outcome after scheduled maintenance treatment for Crohn's disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4(10), 1248–1254 (2006).
    • 14. Papamichael K, Juncadella A, Wong D et al. Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab is associated with better long-term outcomes compared with standard of care in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J. Crohns. Colitis. 13(8), 976–981 (2019). • Validity of drug monitoring using adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease.
    • 15. Seow CH, Newman A, Irwin SP, Steinhart AH, Silverberg MS, Greenberg GR. Trough serum infliximab: a predictive factor of clinical outcome for infliximab treatment in acute ulcerative colitis. Gut 59(1), 49–54 (2010).
    • 16. Restellini S, Chao CY, Lakatos PL et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring guides the management of crohn's patients with secondary loss of response to adalimumab. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 24(7), 1531–1538 (2018).
    • 17. Yanai H, Hanauer SB. Assessing response and loss of response to biological therapies in IBD. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 106(4), 685–698 (2011).
    • 18. O'Sullivan MJ, Marks V. Methods for the preparation of enzyme-antibody conjugates for use in enzyme immunoassay. Methods Enzymol. 73(Pt B), 147–166 (1981).
    • 19. Greenfield EA. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual Harlow E (Ed.). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, USA (1957).
    • 20. Herold T, Jurinovic V, Arnreich C et al. Elevated levels of IL-6 and CRP predict the need for mechanical ventilation in COVID-19. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 146(1), 128–136 e124 (2020).