We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×

Mass spectrometry-based technologies for high-throughput metabolomics

    Jun Han

    University of Victoria – Genome BC Proteomics Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada

    ,
    Raju Datla

    NRC Plant Biotechnology Institute, National Research Council of Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

    ,
    Sammy Chan

    Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, St Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

    &
    Christoph H Borchers

    † Author for correspondence

    University of Victoria – Genome BC Proteomics Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.4155/bio.09.158

    The metabolome is composed of a vast number of small-molecule metabolites that exhibit a diversity of physical and chemical properties and exist over a wide dynamic range in biological samples. Multiple analytical techniques, used in a complementary manner, are required to achieve high coverage of the metabolome. MS is playing a central role in metabolomics research. Herein, we present a brief overview of the MS-based technologies employed for high-throughput metabolomics. These technologies range from chromatography–MS techniques, such as GC–MS and LC–MS, to chromatography-free techniques, such as direct infusion, matrix-assisted and matrix-free laser desorption/ionization, imaging and some new ambient ionization approaches. Chemoinformatics and bioinformatics tools are widely available to facilitate successful metabolomics studies by turning the complex metabolomics data into biological information through streamlined data processing, analysis and interpretation.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

    Bibliography

    • Fiehn O. Metabolomics – the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol. Biol.48(1–2),155–171 (2002).▪ Definition of metabolomics and clarification of the difference between targeted metabolite analysis, metabolic profiling and metabolic fingerprinting.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Goodacre R, Vaidyanathan S, Dunn WB, Harrigan GG, Kell DB. Metabolomics by numbers: acquiring and understanding global metabolite data. Trends Biotechnol.22(5),245–252 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E. ‘Metabonomics’: understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica29(11),1181–1189 (1999).▪ A technical definition of metabonomics.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Raamsdonk LM, Teusink B, Broadhurst D et al. A functional genomics strategy that uses metabolome data to reveal the phenotype of silent mutations. Nat. Biotechnol.19(1),45–50 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • ter Kuile BH, Westerhoff HV. Transcriptome meets metabolome: hierarchical and metabolic regulation of the glycolytic pathway. FEBS Lett.500(3),169–171 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Kim K, Aronov P, Zakharkin SO et al. Urine metabolomics analysis for kidney cancer detection and biomarker discovery. Mol. Cell Proteomics8(3),558–570 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Sreekumar A, Poisson LM, Rajendiran TM et al. Metabolomic profiles delineate potential role for sarcosine in prostate cancer progression. Nature457(7231),910–914 (2009).▪▪ A milestone in cancer metabolomics that identified sarcosine as a potential small-molecule biomarker for prostate cancer progression.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Wikoff WR, Anfora AT, Liu J et al. Metabolomics analysis reveals large effects of gut microflora on mammalian blood metabolites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106(10),3698–3703 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Scherling C, Ulrich K, Ewald D, Weckwerth W. A metabolic signature of the beneficial interaction of the endophyte Paenibacillus sp. isolate and in vitro-grown poplar plants revealed by metabolomics. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.22(8),1032–1037 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 10  Bottcher C, von Roepenack-Lahaye E, Schmidt J et al. Metabolome analysis of biosynthetic mutants reveals a diversity of metabolic changes and allows identification of a large number of new compounds in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.147(4),2107–2120 (2008).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11  MacKenzie DA, Defernez M, Dunn WB et al. Relatedness of medically important strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as revealed by phylogenetics and metabolomics. Yeast25(7),501–512 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 12  Viant MR. Recent developments in environmental metabolomics. Mol. Biosyst.4(10),980–986 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 13  Duarte NC, Becker SA, Jamshidi N et al. Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(6),1777–1782 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 14  Fiehn O. Combining genomics, metabolome analysis, and biochemical modelling to understand metabolic networks. Comp. Funct. Genomics2(3),155–168 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 15  Dunn WB, Bailey NJ, Johnson HE. Measuring the metabolome: current analytical technologies. Analyst130(5),606–625 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 16  Weckwerth W, Fiehn O. Can we discover novel pathways using metabolomic analysis? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.13(2),156–160 (2002).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 17  Villas-Boas SG, Mas S, Akesson M, Smedsgaard J, Nielsen J. Mass spectrometry in metabolome analysis. Mass Spectrom. Rev.24(5),613–646 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 18  Villas-Boas SG, Hojer-Pedersen J, Akesson M, Smedsgaard J, Nielsen J. Global metabolite analysis of yeast: evaluation of sample preparation methods. Yeast22(14),1155–1169 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 19  Dunn WB, Ellis DI. Metabolomics: current analytical platforms and methodologies. Trends Anal. Chem.24(4),285–294 (2005).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 20  Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dormann P, Altmann T, Trethewey RN, Willmitzer L. Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat. Biotechnol.18(11),1157–1161 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 21  Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD. Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Mass Spectrom. Rev.26(1),51–78 (2007).▪ A good review on mass spectrometry-related metabolomics.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 22  Issaq HJ, Van QN, Waybright TJ, Muschik GM, Veenstra TD. Analytical and statistical approaches to metabolomics research. J. Sep. Sci.32(13),2183–2199 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 23  Fiehn O. Extending the breadth of metabolite profiling by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Trends Analyt. Chem.27(3),261–269 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 24  Pasikanti KK, Ho PC, Chan EC. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry in metabolic profiling of biological fluids. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.871(2),202–211 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 25  Metz TO, Zhang Q, Page JS et al. The future of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) in metabolic profiling and metabolomic studies for biomarker discovery. Biomark. Med.1(1),159–185 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 26  Lu W, Bennett BD, Rabinowitz JD. Analytical strategies for LC–MS-based targeted metabolomics. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.871(2),236–242 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 27  Cubbon S, Antonio C, Wilson J, Thomas-Oates J. Metabolomic applications of HILIC–LC–MS. Mass Spectrom. Rev. DOI: 10.1002/mas.20252 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
    • 28  Leon C, Rodriguez-Meizoso I, Lucio M et al. Metabolomics of transgenic maize combining Fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance–mass spectrometry, capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry and pressurized liquid extraction. J. Chromatogr. A1216(43),7314–7323 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 29  Chalcraft KR, Lee R, Mills C, Britz-McKibbin P. Virtual quantification of metabolites by capillary electrophoresis–electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry: predicting ionization efficiency without chemical standards. Anal. Chem.81(7),2506–2515 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 30  Lee R, Ptolemy AS, Niewczas L, Britz-McKibbin P. Integrative metabolomics for characterizing unknown low-abundance metabolites by capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry with computer simulations. Anal. Chem.79(2),403–415 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 31  Ramautar R, Demirci A, de Jong GJ. Capillary electrophoresis in metabolomics. Trends Anal. Chem.25(5),455–466 (2006).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 32  Kuhara T. Gas chromatographic–mass spectrometric urinary metabolome analysis to study mutations of inborn errors of metabolism. Mass Spectrom. Rev.24(6),814–827 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 33  Qualley AV, Dudareva N. Metabolomics of plant volatiles. Methods Mol. Biol.553,329–343 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 34  Halket JM, Waterman D, Przyborowska AM, Patel RK, Fraser PD, Bramley PM. Chemical derivatization and mass spectral libraries in metabolic profiling by GC/MS and LC/MS/MS. J. Exp. Bot.56(410),219–243 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 35  Birkemeyer C, Kolasa A, Kopka J. Comprehensive chemical derivatization for gas chromatography–mass spectrometry-based multi-targeted profiling of the major phytohormones. J. Chromatogr. A.993(1–2),89–102 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 36  Maurer HH. Role of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry with negative ion chemical ionization in clinical and forensic toxicology, doping control, and biomonitoring. Ther. Drug Monit.24(2),247–254 (2002).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 37  Liebeke M, Wunder A, Lalk M. A rapid microwave-assisted derivatization of bacterial metabolome samples for gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis. Anal. Biochem. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.04.030 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 38  Mastovska K, Lehotay SJ. Practical approaches to fast gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A.1000(1–2),153–180 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 39  Kawana S, Nakagawa K, Hasegawa Y, Kobayashi H, Yamaguchi S. Improvement of sample throughput using fast gas chromatography mass-spectrometry for biochemical diagnosis of organic acid disorders. Clin. Chim. Acta392(1–2),34–40 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 40  Libardoni M, Fiehn O, Hawkins J, King TM. Analysis of complex metabolomics samples using high throughput GC TOF and GC×GC TOFMS: the importance of deconvolution and GC×GC. Asian J. Pharmacodynamics Pharmacokinetics7(3),201–209 (2007).Google Scholar
    • 41  Zrostlikova J, Hajslova J, Cajka T. Evaluation of two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the determination of multiple pesticide residues in fruit. J. Chromatogr. A.1019(1–2),173–186 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 42  Li X, Xu Z, Lu X et al. Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry for metabonomics: biomarker discovery for diabetes mellitus. Anal. Chim. Acta633(2),257–262 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 43  Ralston-Hooper K, Hopf A, Oh C, Zhang X, Adamec J, Sepulveda MS. Development of GC×GC/TOF–MS metabolomics for use in ecotoxicological studies with invertebrates. Aquat. Toxicol.88(1),48–52 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 44  Mohler RE, Dombek KM, Hoggard JC, Pierce KM, Young ET, Synovec RE. Comprehensive analysis of yeast metabolite GC × GC-TOFMS data: combining discovery-mode and deconvolution chemometric software. Analyst132(8),756–767 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 45  Koek MM, Muilwijk B, van Stee LL, Hankemeier T. Higher mass loadability in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for improved analytical performance in metabolomics analysis. J. Chromatogr. A1186(1–2),420–429 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 46  Fiehn O, Robertson D, Griffin J et al. The metabolomics standards initiative (MSI). Metabolomics3,175–178 (2007).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 47  Bunk B, Kucklick M, Jonas R et al. MetaQuant: a tool for the automatic quantification of GC/MS-based metabolome data. Bioinformatics22(23),2962–2965 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 48  Borner J, Buchinger S, Schomburg D. A high-throughput method for microbial metabolome analysis using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem.367(2),143–151 (2007).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 49  Halket JM, Przyborowska A, Stein SE, Mallard WG, Down S, Chalmers RA. Deconvolution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry of urinary organic acids – potential for pattern recognition and automated identification of metabolic disorders. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.13(4),279–284 (1999).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 50  Stein SE. An integrated method for spectrum extraction and compound identification from gas chromatography/mass spectrometry data. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spec.10(8),770–781 (1999).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 51  Baran R, Kochi H, Saito N et al. MathDAMP: a package for differential analysis of metabolite profiles. BMC Bioinformatics7,530 (2006).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 52  Smith CA, Want EJ, O’Maille G, Abagyan R, Siuzdak G. XCMS: processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Anal. Chem.78(3),779–787 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 53  Benton HP, Wong DM, Trauger SA, Siuzdak G. XCMS2: processing tandem mass spectrometry data for metabolite identification and structural characterization. Anal. Chem.80(16),6382–6389 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 54  Katajamaa M, Oresic M. Processing methods for differential analysis of LC–MS profile data. BMC Bioinformatics6,179 (2005).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 55  Katajamaa M, Miettinen J, Oresic M. MZmine: toolbox for processing and visualization of mass spectrometry based molecular profile data. Bioinformatics22(5),634–636 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 56  Lommen A. MetAlign: interface-driven, versatile metabolomics tool for hyphenated full-scan mass spectrometry data preprocessing. Anal. Chem.81(8),3079–3086 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 57  De Vos RC, Moco S, Lommen A, Keurentjes JJ, Bino RJ, Hall RD. Untargeted large-scale plant metabolomics using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc.2(4),778–791 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 58  Luedemann A, Strassburg K, Erban A, Kopka J. TagFinder for the quantitative analysis of gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS)-based metabolite profiling experiments. Bioinformatics24(5),732–737 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 59  Broeckling CD, Reddy IR, Duran AL, Zhao X, Sumner LW. MET-IDEA: data extraction tool for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. Anal. Chem.78(13),4334–4341 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 60  Hiller K, Hangebrauk J, Jager C, Spura J, Schreiber K, Schomburg D. MetaboliteDetector: comprehensive analysis tool for targeted and nontargeted GC/MS based metabolome analysis. Anal. Chem.81(9),3429–3439 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 61  LECO. ChromaTOF software. LECO Inc., 1150 Blanchard St., Bellefonte, PA, USA 16823–8618 (2009).Google Scholar
    • 62  Plumb R, Castro-Perez J, Granger J, Beattie I, Joncour K, Wright A. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole-orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.18(19),2331–2337 (2004).▪ Introduction of ultrahigh-performance LC for LC–MS.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 63  Wilson ID, Plumb R, Granger J, Major H, Williams R, Lenz EM. HPLC-MS-based methods for the study of metabonomics. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.817(1),67–76 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 64  Nordstrom A, Want E, Northen T, Lehtio J, Siuzdak G. Multiple ionization mass spectrometry strategy used to reveal the complexity of metabolomics. Anal. Chem.80(2),421–429 (2008).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 65  Robb DB, Covey TR, Bruins AP. Atmospheric pressure photoionization: an ionization method for liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.72(15),3653–3659 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 66  Marchi I, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL. Atmospheric pressure photoionization for coupling liquid-chromatography to mass spectrometry: a review. Talanta78(1),1–18 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 67  Morris HR, Paxton T, Dell A et al. High sensitivity collisionally-activated decomposition tandem mass spectrometry on a novel quadrupole/orthogonal-acceleration time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.10(8),889–896 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 68  Hu Q, Noll RJ, Li H, Makarov A, Hardman M, Graham Cooks R. The Orbitrap: a new mass spectrometer. J. Mass Spectrom.40(4),430–443 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 69  Marshall AG, Hendrickson CL, Jackson GS. Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry: a primer. Mass Spectrom. Rev.17(1),1–35 (1998).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 70  Yates JR, Cociorva D, Liao L, Zabrouskov V. Performance of a linear ion trap-Orbitrap hybrid for peptide analysis. Anal. Chem.78(2),493–500 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 71  Dunn WB, Broadhurst D, Brown M et al. Metabolic profiling of serum using ultra performance liquid chromatography and the LTQ-Orbitrap mass spectrometry system. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.871(2),288–298 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 72  Dunn WB. Current trends and future requirements for the mass spectrometric investigation of microbial, mammalian and plant metabolomes. Phys. Biol.5(1),11001 (2008).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 73  t’Kindt R, Alaerts G, Vander Heyden Y, Deforce D, Van Bocxlaer J. Broad-spectrum separations in metabolomics using enhanced polar LC stationary phases: a dedicated evaluation using plant metabolites. J. Sep. Sci.30(13),2002–2011 (2007).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 74  Bell DS, Jones AD. Solute attributes and molecular interactions contributing to “U-shape” retention on a fluorinated high-performance liquid chromatography stationary phase. J. Chromatogr. A1073(1–2),99–109 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 75  Yoshida H, Yamazaki J, Ozawa S, Mizukoshi T, Miyano H. Advantage of LC–MS metabolomics methodology targeting hydrophilic compounds in the studies of fermented food samples. J. Agric. Food Chem.57(4),1119–1126 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 76  Alpert AJ. Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography for the separation of peptides, nucleic acids and other polar compounds. J. Chromatogr.499,177–196 (1990).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 77  Tolstikov VV, Fiehn O. Analysis of highly polar compounds of plant origin: combination of hydrophilic interaction chromatography and electrospray ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem.301(2),298–307 (2002).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 78  Kamleh A, Barrett MP, Wildridge D, Burchmore RJ, Scheltema RA, Watson DG. Metabolomic profiling using Orbitrap Fourier transform mass spectrometry with hydrophilic interaction chromatography: a method with wide applicability to analysis of biomolecules. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.22(12),1912–1918 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 79  Pesek JJ, Matyska MT, Fischer SM, Sana TR. Analysis of hydrophilic metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry using a silica hydride-based stationary phase. J. Chromatogr. A1204(1),48–55 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 80  Callahan DL, Souza DD, Bacic A, Roessner U. Profiling of polar metabolites in biological extracts using diamond hydride-based aqueous normal phase chromatography. J. Sep. Sci.32(13),2273–2280 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 81  Pesek JJ, Matyska MT, Loo JA, Fischer SM, Sana TR. Analysis of hydrophilic metabolites in physiological fluids by HPLC–MS using a silica hydride-based stationary phase. J. Sep. Sci.32(13),2200–2208 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 82  Weisenberg SA, Butterfield TR, Fischer SM, Rhee KY. Suitability of silica hydride stationary phase, aqueous normal phase chromatography for untargeted metabolomic profiling of Enterococcus faecium and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Sep. Sci.32(13),2262–2265 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 83  SIELC Technologies. 65E Palatine Road, Suite 221, Prospect Heights, IL 60070, USA (2009).Google Scholar
    • 84  Myint KT, Aoshima K, Tanaka S, Nakamura T, Oda Y. Quantitative profiling of polar cationic metabolites in human cerebrospinal fluid by reversed-phase nanoliquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.81(3),1121–1129 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 85  Ceglarek U, Leichtle A, Brugel M et al. Challenges and developments in tandem mass spectrometry based clinical metabolomics. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.301(1–2),266–271 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 86  Sawada Y, Akiyama K, Sakata A et al. Widely targeted metabolomics based on large-scale MS/MS data for elucidating metabolite accumulation patterns in plants. Plant Cell Physiol.50(1),37–47 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 87  Hager JW, Le Blanc JC. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with a new quadrupole/linear ion trap instrument. J. Chromatogr. A.1020(1),3–9 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 88  Hager JW, Yves Le Blanc JC. Product ion scanning using a Q-q-Q linear ion trap (Q TRAP) mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.17(10),1056–1064 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 89  Kitteringham NR, Jenkins RE, Lane CS, Elliott VL, Park BK. Multiple reaction monitoring for quantitative biomarker analysis in proteomics and metabolomics. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci.877(13),1229–1239 (2009).▪ Good review on LC–MS data processing approaches.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 90  Katajamaa M, Oresic M. Data processing for mass spectrometry-based metabolomics. J. Chromatogr. A.1158(1–2),318–328 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 91  Tautenhahn R, Bottcher C, Neumann S. Highly sensitive feature detection for high resolution LC/MS. BMC Bioinformatics9,504 (2008).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 92  Lange E, Tautenhahn R, Neumann S, Gropl C. Critical assessment of alignment procedures for LC–MS proteomics and metabolomics measurements. BMC Bioinformatics9,375 (2008).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 93  Peters S, van Velzen E, Janssen HG. Parameter selection for peak alignment in chromatographic sample profiling: objective quality indicators and use of control samples. Anal. BioAnal. Chem.394(5),1273–1281 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 94  Sysi-Aho M, Katajamaa M, Yetukuri L, Oresic M. Normalization method for metabolomics data using optimal selection of multiple internal standards. BMC Bioinformatics8,93 (2007).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 95  Scholz M, Fiehn O. SetupX – a public study design database for metabolomic projects. Pac. Symp. Biocomput.2007,169–180 (2007).▪ Detailed introduction of the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 96  Wishart DS, Tzur D, Knox C et al. HMDB: the Human Metabolome Database. Nucleic Acids Res.35,D521–D526 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 97  Knox C, Shrivastava S, Stothard P, Eisner R, Wishart DS. BioSpider: a web server for automating metabolome annotations. Pac. Symp. Biocomput.2007,145–156 (2007).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 98  Koulman A, Cao M, Faville M, Lane G, Mace W, Rasmussen S. Semi-quantitative and structural metabolic phenotyping by direct infusion ion trap mass spectrometry and its application in genetical metabolomics. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.23(15),2253–2263 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 99  Ohta D, Shibata D, Kanaya S. Metabolic profiling using Fourier-transform ion-cyclotron-resonance mass spectrometry. Anal. BioAnal. Chem.389(5),1469–1475 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 100  Nakamura Y, Kimura A, Saga H et al. Differential metabolomics unraveling light/dark regulation of metabolic activities in Arabidopsis cell culture. Planta227(1),57–66 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 101  Oikawa A, Nakamura Y, Ogura T et al. Clarification of pathway-specific inhibition by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance/mass spectrometry-based metabolic phenotyping studies. Plant Physiol.142(2),398–413 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 102  Han J, Danell RM, Patel JR et al. Towards high-throughput metabolomics using ultrahigh-field Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Metabolomics4(2),128–140 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 103  Takahashi H, Kai K, Shinbo Y et al. Metabolomics approach for determining growth-specific metabolites based on Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Anal. BioAnal. Chem.391(8),2769–2782 (2008).▪ Application of the mass spectral stitching technique for metabolic fingerprinting by infusion–FTMS.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 104  Southam AD, Payne TG, Cooper HJ, Arvanitis TN, Viant MR. Dynamic range and mass accuracy of wide-scan direct infusion nanoelectrospray fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry-based metabolomics increased by the spectral stitching method. Anal. Chem.79(12),4595–4602 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 105  Staack RF, Varesio E, Hopfgartner G. The combination of liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry and chip-based infusion for improved screening and characterization of drug metabolites. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.19(5),618–626 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 106  Taylor NS, Weber RJM, Southam AD et al. A new approach to toxicity testing in Daphniamagna: application of high throughput FT-ICR mass spectrometry metabolomics. Metabolomics5(1),44–58 (2009).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 107  Karas M, Hillenkamp F. Laser desorption ionization of proteins with molecular masses exceeding 10,000 daltons. Anal. Chem.60(20),2299–2301 (1988).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 108  Vaidyanathan S, Gaskell S, Goodacre R. Matrix-suppressed laser desorption/ionisation mass spectrometry and its suitability for metabolome analyses. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.20(8),1192–1198 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 109  Wang JN, Zhou Y, Zhu TY, Wang X, Guo YL. Prediction of acute cellular renal allograft rejection by urinary metabolomics using MALDI–FTMS. J. Proteome Res.7(8),3597–3601 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 110  Fraser PD, Enfissi EM, Goodfellow M, Eguchi T, Bramley PM. Metabolite profiling of plant carotenoids using the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Plant J.49(3),552–564 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 111  Sun G, Yang K, Zhao Z, Guan S, Han X, Gross RW. Shotgun metabolomics approach for the analysis of negatively charged water-soluble cellular metabolites from mouse heart tissue. Anal. Chem.79(17),6629–6640 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 112  Guo Z, He L. A binary matrix for background suppression in MALDI–MS of small molecules. Anal. BioAnal. Chem.387(5),1939–1944 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 113  Shroff R, Rulisek L, Doubsky J, Svatos A. Acid-base-driven matrix-assisted mass spectrometry for targeted metabolomics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106(25),10092–10096 (2009).▪ Good review on the matrix-free LDI–MS techniques.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 114  Peterson DS. Matrix-free methods for laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev.26(1),19–34 (2007).▪ Development of desorption/ionization on silicon for matrix-free laser desorption/ionization MS.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 115  Wei J, Buriak JM, Siuzdak G. Desorption-ionization mass spectrometry on porous silicon. Nature399(6733),243–246 (1999).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 116  Woo HK, Northen TR, Yanes O, Siuzdak G. Nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry: a protocol for preparing and applying NIMS surfaces for high-sensitivity mass analysis. Nat. Protoc.3(8),1341–1349 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 117  Northen TR, Yanes O, Northen MT et al. Clathrate nanostructures for mass spectrometry. Nature449(7165),1033–1036 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 118  Amantonico AF, Glaus R, Zenobi R. Negative mode nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry for detection of phosphorylated metabolites. Metabolomics DOI: 10.1007/s11306-009-0163-5 (2009) (Epub advance of print).▪ One of the pioneering publications on tissue imaging by MALDI–MS.Google Scholar
    • 119  Caprioli RM, Farmer TB, Gile J. Molecular imaging of biological samples: localization of peptides and proteins using MALDI-TOF MS. Anal. Chem.69(23),4751–4760 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 120  Cha S, Song Z, Nikolau BJ, Yeung ES. Direct profiling and imaging of epicuticular waxes on Arabidopsis thaliana by laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry using silver colloid as a matrix. Anal. Chem.81(8),2991–3000 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 121  Cha S, Yeung ES. Colloidal graphite-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry and MSn of small molecules. 1. Imaging of cerebrosides directly from rat brain tissue. Anal. Chem.79(6),2373–2385 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 122  Zhang H, Cha S, Yeung ES. Colloidal graphite-assisted laser desorption/ionization MS and MS(n) of small molecules. 2. Direct profiling and MS imaging of small metabolites from fruits. Anal. Chem.79(17),6575–6584 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 123  Cha S, Zhang H, Ilarslan HI et al. Direct profiling and imaging of plant metabolites in intact tissues by using colloidal graphite-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. Plant J.55(2),348–360 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 124  Li Y, Shrestha B, Vertes A. Atmospheric pressure molecular imaging by infrared MALDI mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.79(2),523–532 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 125  Li Y, Shrestha B, Vertes A. Atmospheric pressure infrared MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for plant metabolomics. Anal. Chem.80(2),407–420 (2008).▪ Development of the desorption ESI–MS technique.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 126  Takats Z, Wiseman JM, Gologan B, Cooks RG. Mass spectrometry sampling under ambient conditions with desorption electrospray ionization. Science306(5695),471–473 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 127  Cooks RG, Ouyang Z, Takats Z, Wiseman JM. Detection technologies. Ambient mass spectrometry. Science311(5767),1566–1570 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 128  Jackson AU, Werner SR, Talaty N et al. Targeted metabolomic analysis of Escherichia coli by desorption electrospray ionization and extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem.375(2),272–281 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 129  Dill AL, Ifa DR, Manicke NE, Ouyang Z, Cooks RG. Mass spectrometric imaging of lipids using desorption electrospray ionization. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. (2008).MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 130  Wiseman JM, Ifa DR, Song Q, Cooks RG. Tissue imaging at atmospheric pressure using desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) mass spectrometry. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.45(43),7188–7192 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 131  Chen H, Venter A, Cooks RG. Extractive electrospray ionization for direct analysis of undiluted urine, milk and other complex mixtures without sample preparation. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) (19),2042–2044 (2006).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 132  Gu H, Chen H, Pan Z et al. Monitoring diet effects via biofluids and their implications for metabolomics studies. Anal. Chem.79(1),89–97 (2007).▪ Development of the direct analysis in real-time ionization technique.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 133  Cody RB, Laramee JA, Durst HD. Versatile new ion source for the analysis of materials in open air under ambient conditions. Anal. Chem.77(8),2297–2302 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 134  Zhao Y, Lam M, Wu D, Mak R. Quantification of small molecules in plasma with direct analysis in real time tandem mass spectrometry, without sample preparation and liquid chromatographic separation. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.22(20),3217–3224 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 135  Yu S, Crawford E, Tice J, Musselman B, Wu JT. Bioanalysis without sample cleanup or chromatography: the evaluation and initial implementation of direct analysis in real time ionization mass spectrometry for the quantification of drugs in biological matrixes. Anal. Chem.81(1),193–202 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 136  Nemes P, Vertes A. Laser ablation electrospray ionization for atmospheric pressure, in vivo, and imaging mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.79(21),8098–8106 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 137  Nemes P, Barton AA, Li Y, Vertes A. Ambient molecular imaging and depth profiling of live tissue by infrared laser ablation electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.80(12),4575–4582 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 138  Nemes P, Barton AA, Vertes A. Three-dimensional imaging of metabolites in tissues under ambient conditions by laser ablation electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.81(16),6668–6675 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 139  Sripadi P, Nazarian J, Hathout Y, Hoffman EP, Vertes A. In vitro analysis of metabolites from the untreated tissue of Torpedo californica electric organ by mid-infrared laser ablation electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Metabolomics5,263–276 (2009).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 140  Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics Intel. Lab. Syst.2,37–52 (1987).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 141  Wold S, Ruhe A, Wold H, Dunn WI. The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares approach to generalized inverses. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.5,735–743 (1984).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 142  Li X, Lu X, Tian J, Gao P, Kong H, Xu G. Application of fuzzy c-means clustering in data analysis of metabolomics. Anal. Chem.81(11),4468–4475 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 143  Trygg J, Wold S. Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). J. Chemometrics119(16),119–128 (2002).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 144  Wiklund S, Johansson E, Sjostrom L et al. Visualization of GC/TOF–MS-based metabolomics data for identification of biochemically interesting compounds using OPLS class models. Anal. Chem.80(1),115–122 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 145  van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HC, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK, van der Werf MJ. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics7,142 (2006).▪▪ Good paper on how to reliably annotate metabolites from accurate masses, elemental compositions and istopic distribution patterns.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 146  Kind T, Fiehn O. Metabolomic database annotations via query of elemental compositions: mass accuracy is insufficient even at less than 1 ppm. BMC Bioinformatics7,234 (2006).▪ An example for the identification of a novel endogenous metabolite through chemical synthesis and LC–MS/MS.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 147  Kalisiak J, Trauger SA, Kalisiak E et al. Identification of a new endogenous metabolite and the characterization of its protein interactions through an immobilization approach. J. Am. Chem. Soc.131(1),378–386 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 148  Wang Y, Xiao J, Suzek TO, Zhang J, Wang J, Bryant SH. PubChem: a public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res.37,W623–W633 (2009).▪ Another publication on introduction of the HMDB.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 149  Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC et al. HMDB: a knowledgebase for the human metabolome. Nucleic Acids Res.37,D603–D610 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 150  Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC et al. DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res.36,D901–D906 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 151  Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic Acids Res.34,D668–D672 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 152  Fahy E, Sud M, Cotter D, Subramaniam S. LIPID MAPS online tools for lipid research. Nucleic Acids Res.35,W606–W612 (2007).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 153  Sud M, Fahy E, Cotter D et al. LMSD: LIPID MAPS structure database. Nucleic Acids Res.35,D527–D532 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 154  Brown M, Dunn WB, Dobson P et al. Mass spectrometry tools and metabolite-specific databases for molecular identification in metabolomics. Analyst134(7),1322–1332 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 155  Kopka J, Schauer N, Krueger S et al. GMD@CSB.DB: the Golm Metabolome Database. Bioinformatics21(8),1635–1638 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 156  Smith CA, O’Maille G, Want EJ et al. METLIN: a metabolite mass spectral database. Ther. Drug Monit.27(6),747–751 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 157  Matsuda F, Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Niida R, Kuromori T, Shinozaki K, Saito K. MS/MS spectral tag-based annotation of non-targeted profile of plant secondary metabolites. Plant J.57(3),555–577 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 158  Cui Q, Lewis IA, Hegeman AD et al. Metabolite identification via the Madison Metabolomics Consortium Database. Nat. Biotechnol.26(2),162–164 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 159  Kanehisa M, Goto S, Hattori M et al. From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res.34,D354–D357 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 160  Karp PD, Ouzounis CA, Moore-Kochlacs C et al. Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.33(19),6083–6089 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 161  Krummenacker M, Paley S, Mueller L, Yan T, Karp PD. Querying and computing with BioCyc databases. Bioinformatics21(16),3454–3455 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 162  Caspi R, Foerster H, Fulcher CA et al. MetaCyc: a multiorganism database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res.34,D511–D516 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 163  Krieger CJ, Zhang P, Mueller LA et al. MetaCyc: a multiorganism database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res.32,D438–D442 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 164  Karp PD, Riley M, Paley SM, Pellegrini-Toole A. The MetaCyc Database. Nucleic Acids Res.30(1),59–61 (2002).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 165  Romero P, Wagg J, Green ML, Kaiser D, Krummenacker M, Karp PD. Computational prediction of human metabolic pathways from the complete human genome. Genome Biol.6(1),R2 (2005).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 166  Matthews L, Gopinath G, Gillespie M et al. Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes. Nucleic Acids Res.37,D619–D622 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 167  Vastrik I, D’Eustachio P, Schmidt E et al. Correction: reactome: a knowledge base of biologic pathways and processes. Genome Biol.10(2),402 (2009).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 168  Vastrik I, D’Eustachio P, Schmidt E et al. Reactome: a knowledge base of biologic pathways and processes. Genome Biol.8(3),R39 (2007).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 201  PubChem – compound- and species-specific database http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Google Scholar
    • 202  HMDB – compound- and species-specific database www.hmdb.ca/Google Scholar
    • 203  Lipid Maps – compound- and species-specific database www.lipidmaps.org/data/databases.htmlGoogle Scholar
    • 204  KNApSAcK – compound- and species-specific database http://kanaya.naist.jp/KNApSAcK/Google Scholar
    • 205  MMD – compound- and species-specific database http://dbkgroup.org/MMDGoogle Scholar
    • 206  NIST08 – reference spectral library/database www.nist.gov/srd/nist1.htmGoogle Scholar
    • 207  GMD – reference spectral library/database http://csbdb.mpimp-golm.mpg.de/csbdb/gmd/gmd.htmlGoogle Scholar
    • 208  METLIN – reference spectral library/database http://metlin.scripps.edu/Google Scholar
    • 209  MassBank – reference spectral library/database www.massbank.jp/Google Scholar
    • 210  MS2T – reference spectral library/database http://prime.psc.riken.jp/lcms/ms2tview/ms2tview.htmlGoogle Scholar
    • 211  MMCD – reference spectral library/database http://mmcd.nmrfam.wisc.edu/Google Scholar
    • 212  KEGG – pathway-specific database www.genome.jp/kegg/Google Scholar
    • 213  BioCyc – pathway-specific database http://biocyc.org/Google Scholar
    • 214  EcoCyc – pathway-specific database http://biocyc.org/ecocyc/index.shtmlGoogle Scholar
    • 215  MetaCyc – pathway-specific database http://biocyc.org/metacyc/index.shtmlGoogle Scholar
    • 216  HumanCyc – pathway-specific database http://humancyc.org/Google Scholar
    • 217  Reactome – pathway-specific database http://reactome.org/Google Scholar