Recent advances in the application of hydrophilic interaction chromatography for the analysis of biological matrices

References

• 1 Schapperer E, Daumann H, Lamouche S, Thyroff-Friesinger U, Viel F, Weitschies W. Bioequivalence of Sandoz methylphenidate osmotic-controlled release tablet with Concerta ^® (Janssen-Cilag). Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 3(1), 1–8 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• 2 Pellowska M, Stein C, Pohland M et al. Pharmacokinetic properties of MH84, a γ-secretase modulator with PPARγ agonistic activity. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 102, 417–424 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3 Mach AJ, Adeyiga OB, Di Carlo D. Microfluidic sample preparation for diagnostic cytopathology. Lab Chip. 13(6), 1011–1026 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Montesano C, Simeoni MC, Curini R, Sergi M, Lo Sterzo C, Compagnone D. Determination of illicit drugs and metabolites in oral fluid by microextraction on packed sorbent coupled with LC–MS/MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 407(13), 3647–3658 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Balcells G, Pozo OJ, Esquivel A et al. Screening for anabolic steroids in sports: analytical strategy based on the detection of phase I and phase II intact urinary metabolites by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1389, 65–75 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6 Linden JC, Lawhead CL. Liquid chromatography of saccharides. J. Chromatogr. A. 105, 125–133 (1975).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 7 Alpert AJ. Hydrophilic-interaction chromatography for the separation of peptides, nucleic acids and other polar compounds. J. Chromatogr. 499, 177–196 (1990).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8 Buszewski B, Noga S. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC)-a powerful separation technique. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 402(1), 231–247 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9 Hsieh Y, Chen J. Simultaneous determination of nicotinic acid and its metabolites using hydrophilic interaction chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 19(21), 3031–3036 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Olsen BA. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography using amino and silica columns for the determination of polar pharmaceuticals and impurities. J. Chromatogr. A. 913(1–2), 113–122 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11 Tao Y, Chen D, Yu H et al. Simultaneous determination of 15 aminoglycoside(s) residues in animal derived foods by automated solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 135(2), 676–683 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 D'Avila FB, Pereira AG, Salazar FR et al. Determination of cocaine/crack biomarkers in colostrum by LC–MS following protein precipitation. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 103, 67–72 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13 Langrock T, Czihal P, Hoffmann R. Amino acid analysis by hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled on-line to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Amino Acids 30(3), 291–297 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14 Boersema PJ, Divecha N, Heck AJR, Mohammed S. Evaluation and optimization of ZIC-HILIC-RP as an alternative MudPIT strategy. J. Proteome Res. 6(3), 937–946 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15 Bernal J, Ares AM, Pól J, Wiedmer SK. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography in food analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 1218(42), 7438–7452 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Mountain RD. Molecular dynamics simulation of water-acetonitrile mixtures in a silica slit. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117(8), 3923–3929 (2013).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 17 Melnikov SM, Höltzel A, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Tallarek U. A molecular dynamics study on the partitioning mechanism in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Angew. Chemie. Int. Ed. Engl. 51(25), 6251–6254 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Hemström P, Irgum K. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 29(12), 1784–1821 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 Jandera P. Stationary and mobile phases in hydrophilic interaction chromatography: a review. Anal. Chim. Acta 692(1–2), 1–25 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Guo Y, Gaiki S. Retention and selectivity of stationary phases for hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 1218(35), 5920–5938 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Gritti F, Höltzel A, Tallarek U, Guiochon G. The relative importance of the adsorption and partitioning mechanisms in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 1376, 112–25 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Shou WZ, Chen YL, Eerkes A et al. Ultrafast liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry bioanalysis of polar analytes using packed silica columns. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16(17), 1613–1621 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 23 Kahsay G, Song H, Van Schepdael A, Cabooter D, Adams E. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) in the analysis of antibiotics. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 87, 142–154 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 McCalley DV. Is hydrophilic interaction chromatography with silica columns a viable alternative to reversed-phase liquid chromatography for the analysis of ionisable compounds? J. Chromatogr. A. 1171(1–2), 46–55 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25 Jin Y, Liang T, Fu Q et al. Fingerprint analysis of Ligusticum chuanxiong using hydrophilic interaction chromatography and reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr. A. 1216, 2136–2141 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 Gilar M, Olivova P, Daly AE, Gebler JC. Orthogonality of separation in two-dimensional liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem. 77(19), 6426–6434 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27 Simon R, Enjalbert Q, Biarc J, Lemoine J, Salvador A. Evaluation of hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) versus C18 reversed-phase chromatography for targeted quantification of peptides by mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1264, 31–39 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28 Periat A, Boccard J, Veuthey J-L, Rudaz S, Guillarme D. Systematic comparison of sensitivity between hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1312, 49–57 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 Jian W, Edom RW, Xu Y, Weng N. Recent advances in application of hydrophilic interaction chromatography for quantitative bioanalysis. J. Sep. Sci. 33(6–7), 681–697 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Xu RN, Fan L, Rieser MJ, El-Shourbagy TA. Recent advances in high-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC–MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 44(2), 342–355 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 Ruta J, Rudaz S, McCalley DV, Veuthey J-L, Guillarme D. A systematic investigation of the effect of sample diluent on peak shape in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 1217(52), 8230–8240 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32 Marclay F, Grata E, Perrenoud L, Saugy M. A one-year monitoring of nicotine use in sport: frontier between potential performance enhancement and addiction issues. Forensic Sci. Int. 213(1–3), 73–84 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Heinig K, Wirz T, Yuan M, Tingler M, Mylott W. An improved LC–MS/MS method for the determination of taspoglutide in plasma and urine using orthogonal HILIC-RP column switching, ultra-performance LC separation and “wrong-way-round” electrospray ionization. Biomed. Chromatogr. 25(11), 1215–1221 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Vilhena RDO, Pontes FLD, Marson BM et al. A new HILIC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous analysis of carbidopa, levodopa, and its metabolites in human plasma. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 967, 41–49 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Zhou Z, Wu X, Wei Q et al. Development and validation of a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of five first-line antituberculosis drugs in plasma. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405(19), 6323–6335 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 Falta T, Koellensperger G, Standler A, Buchberger W, Mader RM, Hann S. Quantification of cisplatin, carboplatin and oxaliplatin in spiked human plasma samples by ICP-SFMS and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) combined with ICP-MS detection. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 24(10), 1336–1342 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 37 Cho HE, Ahn SY, Son IS et al. Determination and validation of tetrodotoxin in human whole blood using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy and its application. Forensic Sci. Int. 217(1–3), 76–80 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 Holder BR, McNaney CA, Luchetti D, Schaeffer E, Drexler DM. Bioanalysis of acetylcarnitine in cerebrospinal fluid by HILIC-mass spectrometry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 29, 1375–1379 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Liu A, Coleman SP. Determination of metformin in human plasma using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 877(29), 3695–3700 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40 Baughman TM, Wright WL, Hutton KA. Determination of zanamivir in rat and monkey plasma by positive ion hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC)/tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 852(1–2), 505–511 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41 Zeng W, Xu Y, Constanzer M, Woolf EJ. Determination of sitagliptinin human plasma using protein precipitation and tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 878(21), 1817–1823 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Apostolou C, Kousoulos C, Dotsikas Y, Loukas Y. Comparison of hydrophilic interaction and reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometric detection for the determination of three pharmaceuticals in human plasma. Biomed. Chromatogr. 22(10), 1139–1402 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 43 Stack BC, Ye J, Willis R, Hubbard M, Hendrickson HP. Determination of oral bioavailability of fusaric acid in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Drugs R. D. 14(2), 139–145 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44 Ahmad Shafeeque, Kalra Harsh, Gupta Amit, Raut Bharat, Hussain Arshad, Rahman MA. HybridSPE: a novel technique to reduce phospholipid-based matrix effect in LC-ESI-MS Bioanalysis. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 4(4), 267–275 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 45 Eerkes A, Shou WZ, Naidong W. Liquid/liquid extraction using 96-well plate format in conjunction with hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of fluconazole in human plasma. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 31(5), 917–928 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46 Song Q, Naidong W. Analysis of omeprazole and 5-OH omeprazole in human plasma using hydrophilic interaction chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS) - Eliminating evaporation and reconstitution steps in 96-well liquid/liquid extraction. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 830(1), 135–142 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47 Xue YJ, Liu J, Unger S. A 96-well single-pot liquid-liquid extraction, hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the determination of muraglitazar in human plasma. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 41(3), 979–988 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48 Johnson CR, Zhang B, Fantauzzi P, Hocker M, Yager KM. Libraries of N-alkylaminoheterocycles from nucleophilic aromatic substitution with purification by solid supported liquid extraction. Tetrahedron 54(16), 4097–4106 (1998).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 49 Pan J, Jiang X, Chen YL. Automatic supported liquid extraction (SLE) coupled with HILIC-MS/MS: an application to method development and validation of erlotinib in human plasma. Pharmaceutics 2(2), 105–118 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50 Ramesh B, Manjula N, Ramakrishna S, Devi PS. Direct injection HILIC–MS/MS analysis of darunavir in rat plasma applying supported liquid extraction. J. Pharm. Anal. 5(1), 43–50 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51 Novakova L. UHPLC in modern bioanalysis. In: UHPLC in Life Sciences. Guillarme D, Veuthey JL (Eds). Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 237–277 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 52 Roen BT, Sellevag SR, Lundanes E. Quantification of nerve agent biomarkers in human serum and urine. Anal. Chem. 86, 11833–11840 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 53 Petteys BJ, Graham KS, Parnás ML, Holt C, Frank EL. Performance characteristics of an LC–MS/MS method for the determination of plasma metanephrines. Clin. Chim. Acta 413(19–20), 1459–1465 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54 Song Q, Junga H, Tang Y et al. Automated 96-well solid phase extraction and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric method for the analysis of cetirizine (ZYRTEC) in human plasma - With emphasis on method ruggedness. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 814(1), 105–114 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 55 Lindegårdh N, Hanpithakpong W, Wattanagoon Y, Singhasivanon P, White NJ, Day NPJ. Development and validation of a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method for determination of oseltamivir and its metabolite oseltamivir carboxylate in plasma, saliva and urine. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 859(1), 74–83 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56 Cohen S, Lhuillier F, Mouloua Y, Vignal B, Favetta P, Guitton J. Quantitative measurement of propofol and in main glucuroconjugate metabolites in human plasma using solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 854(1–2), 165–172 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57 Rogeberg M, Malerod H, Roberg-Larsen H, Aass C, Wilson SR. On-line solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography, with emphasis on modern bioanalysis and miniaturized systems. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 87, 120–129 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 58 Mihailova A, Malerød H, Wilson SR et al. Improving the resolution of neuropeptides in rat brain with on-line HILIC-RP compared with on-line SCX-RP. J. Sep. Sci. 31(3), 459–467 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 59 Álvarez-Sánchez B, Priego-Capote F, Mata-Granados JM, Luque de Castro MD. Automated determination of folate catabolites in human biofluids (urine, breast milk and serum) by on-line SPE-HILIC-MS/MS. J. Chromatogr. A. 1217(28), 4688–4695 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 60 Kopp EK, Sieber M, Kellert M, Dekant W. Rapid and sensitive HILIC-ESI-MS/MS quantitation of polar metabolites of acrylamide in human urine using column switching with an online trap column. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56(21), 9828–9834 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 61 Johnsen E, Leknes S, Wilson SR, Lundanes E. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry platform for both small neurotransmitters and neuropeptides in blood, with automatic and robust solid phase extraction. Sci. Rep. 5, 9308 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 62 Vlčková H, Janák J, Gottvald T, Trejtnar F, Solich P, Nováková L. How to address the sample preparation of hydrophilic compounds: determination of entecavir in plasma and plasma ultrafiltrate with novel extraction sorbents. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 88, 377–344 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 63 Abdel-Rehim M. Recent advances in microextraction by packed sorbent for bioanalysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 1217(16), 2569–2580 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 64 Altun Z, Abdel-Rehim M, Blomberg LG. New trends in sample preparation: on-line microextraction in packed syringe (MEPS) for LC and GC applications: part III: determination and validation of local anaesthetics in human plasma samples using a cation-exchange sorbent, and MEPS-LC–MS-MS. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 813(1–2), 129–135 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 65 Magiera S, Baranowski J. Determination of carnitine and acylcarnitines in human urine by means of microextraction in packed sorbent and hydrophilic interaction chromatography–ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 109, 171–176 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 66 Vuckovic D, Pawliszyn J. Systematic evaluation of solid-phase microextraction coatings for untargeted metabolomic profiling of biological fluids by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 83(6), 1944–1954 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 67 Yeung JCY, de Lannoy I, Gien B et al. Semi-automated in vivo solid-phase microextraction sampling and the diffusion-based interface calibration model to determine the pharmacokinetics of methoxyfenoterol and fenoterol in rats. Anal. Chim. Acta 742, 37–44 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 68 Miller IV JH, Poston PA, Karnes HT. Direct analysis of dried blood spots by in-line desorption combined with high-resolution chromatography and mass spectrometry for quantification of maple syrup urine disease biomarkers leucine and isoleucine. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 400(1), 237–244 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69 Zheng MM, Zhang MY, Feng YQ. Polymer monolith microextraction online coupled to hydrophilic interaction chromatography/mass spectrometry for analysis of β2-agonist in human urine. J. Sep. Sci. 32(11), 1965–1974 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 70 Rao RN, Maurya PK, Khalid S. Development of a molecularly imprinted polymer for selective extraction followed by liquid chromatographic determination of sitagliptin in rat plasma and urine. Talanta 85(2), 950–957 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 71 Quintela O, Lendoiro E, Cruz A et al. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HILIC-MS/MS) determination of cocaine and its metabolites benzoylecgonine, ecgonine methyl ester, and cocaethylene in hair samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 396(5), 1703–1712 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 72 Kloos DP, Lingeman H, Niessen WMA, Deelder AM, Giera M, Mayboroda OA. Evaluation of different column chemistries for fast urinary metabolic profiling. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 927, 90–96 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 73 Pucci V, Giuliano C, Zhang R et al. HILIC LC–MS for the determination of 2′-C-methyl-cytidine-triphosphate in rat liver. J. Sep. Sci. 32(9), 1275–1283 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 74 Kanamori T, Isokawa M, Funatsu T, Tsunoda M. Development of analytical method for catechol compounds in mouse urine using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J. Chromatogr. B. 985, 142–148 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 75 Nováková L, Gottvald T, Vlčková H, Trejtnar F, Mandíková J, Solich P. Highly sensitive fast determination of entecavir in rat urine by means of hydrophilic interaction chromatography-ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1259, 237–243 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 76 Teleki A, Sánchez-Kopper A, Takors R. Alkaline conditions in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography for intracellular metabolite quantification using tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 475, 4–13 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 77 Tomšíková H, Solich P, Nováková L. Sample preparation and UHPLC-FD analysis of pteridines in human urine. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 95, 265–272 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 78 McCalley DV, Neue UD. Estimation of the extent of the water-rich layer associated with the silica surface in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A. 1192(2), 225–229 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 79 Mercier T, Tissot F, Gardiol C et al. High-throughput hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry for the optimized quantification of the anti-Gram-negatives antibiotic colistin A/B and its pro-drug colistimethate. J. Chromatogr. A. 1369, 52–63 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 80 Nováková L, Havlíková L, Vlčková H. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography of polar and ionizable compounds by UHPLC. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 63, 55–64 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 81 Zhang G, Walker AD, Lin Z et al. Strategies for quantitation of endogenous adenine nucleotides in human plasma using novel ion-pair hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1325, 129–136 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 82 Siakkou E, Wilbanks SM, Jameson GNL. Simplified cysteine dioxygenase activity assay allows simultaneous quantitation of both substrate and product. Anal. Biochem. 405(1), 127–131 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 83 Van Damme T, Lachová M, Lynen F, Szucs R, Sandra P. Solid-phase extraction based on hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with acetone as eluent for eliminating matrix effects in the analysis of biological fluids by LC–MS. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406(2), 401–407 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 84 Ismaiel OA, Zhang T, Jenkins RG, Karnes HT. Investigation of endogenous blood plasma phospholipids, cholesterol and glycerides that contribute to matrix effects in bioanalysis by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 878(31), 3303–3316 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 85 Chauve B, Guillarme D, Cléon P, Veuthey JL. Evaluation of various HILIC materials for the fast separation of polar compounds. J. Sep. Sci. 33(6–7), 752–764 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 86 Liu J, Wang L, Hu W, Chen X, Zhong D. Development of a UHPLC–MS/MS method for the determination of plasma histamine in various mammalian species. J. Chromatogr. B. 971, 35–42 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 87 Wang S, Wu H, Huang X et al. Determination of N-methylcytisine in rat plasma by UPLC–MS/MS and its application to pharmacokinetic study. J. Chromatogr. B. 990, 118–124 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 88 Kahsay G, Broeckhoven K, Adams E, Desmet G, Cabooter D. Kinetic performance comparison of fully and superficially porous particles with a particle size of 5 μm: Intrinsic evaluation and application to the impurity analysis of griseofulvin. Talanta 122, 122–129 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 89 Jaisson S, Gorisse L, Pietrement C, Gillery P. Quantification of plasma homocitrulline using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 402(4), 1635–1641 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 90 Peng M, Liu L, Jiang M et al. Measurement of free carnitine and acylcarnitines in plasma by HILIC-ESI-MS/MS without derivatization. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 932, 12–18 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 91 Kong N, Yi R, Zhao S et al. Development and validation of a hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous detection and quantification of etilefrine and oxilofrine in equine blood plasma and urine. J. Sep. Sci. 37(21), 3015–3023 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 92 Sneekens EJ, Rieux L, Swart R. Nano LC: principles, evolution, and state-of-the-art of the technique. LCGC North America 29(10), 926e34 (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 93 Mechref Y, Novotny MV. Miniaturized separation techniques in glycomic investigations. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 841(1–2), 65–78 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 94 De Mello AJ, Beard N. Dealing with real samples: sample pre-treatment in microfluidic systems. Lab Chip 3(1), 11–19 (2003).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 95 Vyawahare S, Griffiths AD, Merten CA. Miniaturization and parallelization of biological and chemical assays in microfluidic devices. Chem. Biol. 17(10), 1052–1065 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 96 Soltani S, Jouyban S. Biological sample preparation: attempts on productivity increasing in bioanalysis. Bioanalysis 6(12), 1691–1710 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 97 Aturki Z, D'Orazio G, Rocco A, Si-Ahmed K, Fanali S. Investigation of polar stationary phases for the separation of sympathomimetic drugs with nano-liquid chromatography in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography mode. Anal. Chim. Acta 685(1), 103–110 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 98 Wuhrer M, Deelder AM. Negative-mode MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS of oligosaccharides labeled with 2-aminobenzamide. Anal. Chem. 77(21), 6954–6959 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 99 Mauko L, Pelzing M, Dolman S et al. Zwitterionic-type hydrophilic interaction nano-liquid chromatography of complex and high mannose glycans coupled with electrospray ionisation high resolution time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1218(37), 6419–6425 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 100 Zauner G, Deelder AM, Wuhrer M. Recent advances in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) for structural glycomics. Electrophoresis 32(24), 3456–3466 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 101 Wuhrer M, de Boer AR, Deelder AM. Structural glycomics using hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) with mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 28, 192–206 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 102 Tousi F, Bones J, Hancock WS, Hincapie M. Differential chemical derivatization integrated with chromatographic separation for analysis of isomeric sialylated N-glycans: a nano-hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-MS platform. Anal. Chem. 85(17), 8421–8428 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 103 Luo Q, Rejtar T, Wu SL, Karger BL. Hydrophilic interaction 10 μm I.D. porous layer open tubular columns for ultratrace glycan analysis by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1216(8), 1223–1231 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 104 Ríos Á, Zougagh M, Avila M. Miniaturization through lab-on-a-chip: utopia or reality for routine laboratories? A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 740, 1–11 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 105 Zhao C, Wu Z, Xue G et al. Ultra-high capacity liquid chromatography chip/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry for pharmaceutical analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 1218(23), 3669–3674 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 106 Andrews GL, Simons BL, Young JB, Hawkridge AM, Muddiman DC. Performance characteristics of a new hybrid triple quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 83(13), 5442–5446 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 107 Staples GO, Bowman MJ, Costello CE et al. A chip-based amide-HILIC LC/MS platform for glycosaminoglycan glycomics profiling. Proteomics 9(3), 686–695 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 108 Staples GO, Naimy H, Yin H et al. Improved hydrophilic interaction chromatography LC/MS of heparinoids using a chip with postcolumn makeup flow. Anal. Chem. 82(2), 516–522 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 109 Huang Y, Shi X, Yu X et al. Improved liquid chromatography-MS/MS of heparan sulfate oligosaccharides via chip-based pulsed makeup flow. Anal. Chem. 83(21), 8222–8229 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 110 Yin H, Killeen K. The fundamental aspects and applications of Agilent HPLC-Chip. J. Sep. Sci. 30(10), 1427–1434 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 111 Lísa M, Cífková E, Holčapek M. Lipidomic profiling of biological tissues using off-line two-dimensional high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1218(31), 5146–5156 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 112 Wang S, Li J, Shi X, Qiao L, Lu X, Xu G. A novel stop-flow two-dimensional liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for lipid analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 1321, 65–72 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 113 Ling YS, Liang HJ, Lin MH et al. Two-dimensional LC–MS/MS to enhance ceramide and phosphatidylcholine species profiling in mouse liver. Biomed. Chromatogr. 28(9), 1284–1293 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 114 Gilar M, Yu Y-Q, Ahn J et al. Characterization of glycoprotein digests with hydrophilic interaction chromatography and mass spectrometry. Anal. Biochem. 417(1), 80–88 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 115 Di Palma S, Boersema PJ, Heck AJR, Mohammed S. Zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (ZIC-HILIC and ZIC-cHILIC) provide high resolution separation and increase sensitivity in proteome analysis. Anal. Chem. 83(9), 3440–3447 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 116 Di Palma S, Mohammed S, Heck AJR. ZIC-cHILIC as a fractionation method for sensitive and powerful shotgun proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 7(11), 2041–2055 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 117 Liu A, Tweed J, Wujcik CE. Investigation of an on-line two-dimensional chromatographic approach for peptide analysis in plasma by LC–MS-MS. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 877(20–21), 1873–1881 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 118 Zhao Y, Kong RPW, Li G et al. Fully automatable two-dimensional hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-reversed phase liquid chromatography with online tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics. J. Sep. Sci. 35(14), 1755–1763 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 119 Appiah-Amponsah E, Owusu-Sarfo K, Ye T, Gowda GAN, Raftery D. Combining hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) and isotope tagging for off-Line LC-NMR applications in metabolite analysis. Metabolites 3(3), 575–591 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 120 Fairchild JN, Horvath K, Gooding JR, Campagna SR, Guiochon G. Two-dimensional liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry separation of water-soluble metabolites. J. Chromatogr. A. 1217(52), 8161–8166 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 121 García-Gómez D, Rodríguez-Gonzalo E, Carabias-Martínez R. Design and development of a two-dimensional system based on hydrophilic and reversed-phase liquid chromatography with on-line sample treatment for the simultaneous separation of excreted xenobiotics and endogenous metabolites in urine. Biomed. Chromatogr. 29(8), 1190–1196 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 122 Cabooter D, Choikhet K, Lestremau F, Dittmann M, Desmet G. Towards a generic variable column length method development strategy for samples with a large variety in polarity. J. Chromatogr. A. 1372, 174–186 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 123 Boersema PJ, Mohammed S, Heck AJR. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) in proteomics. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 391(1), 151–159 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 124 Cífková E, Holčapek M, Lísa M. Nontargeted lipidomic characterization of porcine organs using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and off-line two-dimensional liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Lipids 48(9), 915–928 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 125 Ismaiel OA, Jenkins RG. Development and optimization of on-line 2-dimensional chromatographic approaches for eliminating matrix effects and improving bioanalysis of peptides in human plasma using UHPLC–MS/MS. Drug Test. Anal. 6(5), 415–425 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 126 Simon R, Passeron S, Lemoine J, Salvador A. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography as second dimension in multidimensional chromatography with an anionic trapping strategy: application to prostate-specific antigen quantification. J. Chromatogr. A. 1354, 75–84 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 127 Thomas A, Déglon J, Steimer T, Mangin P, Daali Y, Staub C. On-line desorption of dried blood spots coupled to hydrophilic interaction/reversed-phase LC/MS/MS system for the simultaneous analysis of drugs and their polar metabolites. J. Sep. Sci. 33(6–7), 873–879 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 128 D'Attoma A, Grivel C, Heinisch S. On-line comprehensive two-dimensional separations of charged compounds using reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography and hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Part I: orthogonality and practical peak capacity considerations. J. Chromatogr. A. 1262, 148–159 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 129 Eeltink S, Dolman S, Vivo-Truyols G et al. Selection of column dimensions and gradient conditions to maximize the peak-production rate in comprehensive off-line two-dimensional liquid chromatography using monolithic columns. Anal. Chem. 82(16), 7015–7020 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 130 Dugo P, Fawzy N, Cichello F, Cacciola F, Donato P, Mondello L. Stop-flow comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometric detection for phospholipid analysis. J. Chromatogr. A. 1278, 46–53 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 131 Naidong W. Bioanalytical liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods on underivatized silica columns with aqueous/organic mobile phases. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 796(2), 209–224 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 132 Xu RN, Rieser MJ, El-Shourbagy TA. Bioanalytical hydrophilic interaction chromatography: recent challenges, solutions and applications. Bioanalysis 1(1), 239–253 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 133 Feng S, Zhao Q, Jiang J, Hu P. Determination of phenylephrine in human plasma using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 915–916, 28–32 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 134 Tsikas D, Schmidt M, Böhmer A, Zoerner AA, Gutzki FM, Jordan J. UPLC–MS/MS measurement of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) in human plasma solves the S-nitrosothiol concentration enigma. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 927, 147–157 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 135 Isaguirre AC, Olsina RA, Martinez LD, Lapierre AV, Cerutti S. Rapid and sensitive HILIC-MS/MS analysis of carnitine and acetylcarnitine in biological fluids. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405(23), 7397–7404 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 136 Gray N, Heaton J, Musenga A, Cowan DA, Plumb RS, Smith NW. Comparison of reversed-phase and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography for the quantification of ephedrines using medium-resolution accurate mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1289, 37–46 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 137 Kolmonen M, Leinonen A, Kuuranne T, Pelander A, Ojanperä I. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and accurate mass measurement for quantification and confirmation of morphine, codeine and their glucuronide conjugates in human urine. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 878(29), 2959–2966 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 138 Horie K, Kamakura T, Ikegami T et al. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography using a metre-scale monolithic silica capillary column for proteomics LC–MS. Anal. Chem. 86, 3817–3824 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 139 Cifkova E, Holcapek M, Lisa M et al. Nontargeted quantitation of lipid classes using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry with single internal standard and response factor approach. Anal Chem. 84(22), 10064–10070 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 140 Losito I, Patruno R, Conte E, Cataldi TRI, Megli FM, Palmisano F. Phospholipidomics of human blood microparticles. Anal. Chem. 85(13), 6405–6413 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 141 Giménez E, Balmaña M, Figueras J et al. Quantitative analysis of N-glycans from human alfa-acid-glycoprotein using stable isotope labeling and zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction capillary liquid chromatography electrospray mass spectrometry as tool for pancreatic disease diagnosis. Anal. Chim. Acta 866, 59–68 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 142 Shi Y, Xu X, Fang M et al. Quantitative hydrophilic interaction chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of N-acetylneuraminic acid and N-acetylmannosamine in human plasma. J. Chromatogr. B. 1000, 105–111 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 143 Wang PG, He W. Hydrophilic Interacion Liquid Chromatography (HILIC) and Advanced Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 477–485 (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 144 Godoy-Ramos R, Novoa-Gundel P, Jara-Vasquez P, Lamperti-Fernandez L, Gomez-Gaete C. NP/HILIC-ELSD separation of phospholipid classes and application to preliminary analysis of plasma low density lipoproteins. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 38(2), 243–250 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• 145 Mitchell CR, Bao Y, Benz NJ, Zhang S. Comparison of the sensitivity of evaporative universal detectors and LC/MS in the HILIC and the reversed-phase HPLC modes. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 877(32), 4133–4139 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 146 Jia S, Park JH, Lee J, Kwon SW. Comparison of two aerosol-based detectors for the analysis of gabapentin in pharmaceutical formulations by hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Talanta 85(5), 2301–2306 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 147 Almeling S, Ilko D, Holzgrabe U. Charged aerosol detection in pharmaceutical analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 69, 50–63 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 148 Kumar A, Hart JP, McCalley DV. Determination of catecholamines in urine using hydrophilic interaction chromatography with electrochemical detection. J. Chromatogr. A. 1218(25), 3854–3861 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 149 Bergeron A, Garofolo F. Importance of matrix effects in LC–MS/MS bioanalysis. Bioanalysis. 5(19), 2331–2332 (2013).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 150 Hsieh Y. Potential of HILIC-MS in quantitative bioanalysis of drugs and drug metabolites. J. Sep. Sci. 31(9), 1481–1491 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 151 Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM. Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC–MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 75(13), 3019–3030 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 152 Bonfiglio R, Bonfiglio R, King R et al. The effects of sample preparation methods on the variability of the electrospray ionization response for model drug compounds. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 13(12), 1175–1185 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 153 Hsieh Y, Chintala M, Mei H et al. Quantitative screening and matrix effect studies of drug discovery compounds in monkey plasma using fastgradient liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 15(24), 2481–2487 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 154 Ekdahl A, Johansson MC, Ahnoff M. Tracing and separating plasma components causing matrix effects in hydrophilic interaction chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 923–924, 83–91 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 155 Mess J-N, Côté C, Bergeron A, Furtado M, Garofolo F. Selection of HILIC columns to handle matrix effect due to phospholipids. Bioanalysis 1(1), 57–62 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 156 Tan B, Negahban A, McDonald T, Zhang Y, Holliman C. Utilization of hydrophilic-interaction LC to minimize matrix effects caused by phospholipids. Bioanalysis 4(16), 2049–2058 (2012).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 157 Vigliano M, Bianchera A. Determination of hyaluronic acid in a chitosan-based formulation by RP C18 and HILIC LC – ESI-MS: an evaluation of matrix effect. Chromatographia 76(23–24), 1761–1766 (2013).
  CASGoogle Scholar