We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×

Biocide-conjugated magnetite nanoparticles as an advanced platform for biofilm treatment

    Viktoriya Rumyantceva

    Laboratory of Solution Chemistry of Advanced Materials & Technologies, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, 191002, Russian Federation

    ,
    Valeriya Rumyantceva

    Laboratory of Solution Chemistry of Advanced Materials & Technologies, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, 191002, Russian Federation

    ,
    Elena Koshel

    *Authors for correspondence:

    Laboratory of Solution Chemistry of Advanced Materials & Technologies, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, 191002, Russian Federation

    &
    Vladimir Vinogradov

    **Authors for correspondence:

    Laboratory of Solution Chemistry of Advanced Materials & Technologies, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, 191002, Russian Federation

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.4155/tde-2019-0011

    Biofilm-related diseases contribute to patient morbidity, increased mortality and represent a considerable economic burden. Despite numerous developments in the field of combating biofilms, the most effective treatment method is still the mechanical removal of biofilms or the replacement of a device overgrown with biofilm. Given that the main challenges are the mechanical stability of biofilms, low penetration of biocides and the persistence of cells with reduced metabolic status in them, a promising direction is the use of magnetically controlled materials for their treatment. Current review discusses recent applications of magnetite-based materials as biocide delivery carriers and effectiveness of these conjugates against biofilms.

    Graphical abstract

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

    References

    • 1 Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Ehrlich GD, Montanaro L. Biofilm-based implant infections in orthopaedics. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 29–46 (2015).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Montanaro L. Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16(7), 397–409 (2018).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Montanaro L, Speziale P, Campoccia D et al. Scenery of Staphylococcus implant infections in orthopedics. Future Microbiol. 6(11), 1329–1349 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Richards PJ, Riddell L, Reznek RH, Armstrong P, Pinching AJ, Parkin JM. High resolution computed tomography in HIV patients with suspected Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and a normal chest radiograph. Clin. Radiol. 51(10), 689–693 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Nandakumar V, Chittaranjan S, Kurian VM, Doble M. Characteristics of bacterial biofilm associated with implant material in clinical practice. Polym. J. 45(2), 137–152 (2013).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Raghunath A, Perumal E. Metal oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: a promise for the future. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 49(2), 137–152 (2017). •• Authors compared mechanisms of different metal oxides nanoparticles antibacterial activity on various bacterial types.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Ramteke C, Sarangi BK, Chakrabarti T, Mudliar S, Pandey RA. Synthesis and broad spectrum antibacterial activity of magnetite ferrofluid. Curr. Nanosc. 6(6), 587–591 (2010).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Arokiyaraj S, Saravanan M, Udaya Prakash NK, Valan Arasu M, Vijayakumar B, Vincent S. Enhanced antibacterial activity of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles treated with Argemone mexicana L. leaf extract: an in vitro study. Mater. Res. Bull. 48(9), 3323–3327 (2013).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Yong C, Chen X, Xiang Q, Li Q, Xing X. Recyclable magnetite-silver heterodimer nanocomposites with durable antibacterial performance. Bioact. Mater. 3(1), 80–86 (2018). • Described nanocomposite possessing antibacterial activity and recyclable ability concurrently.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Prabhu YT, Rao KV, Kumari BS, Kumar VSS, Pavani T. Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and its antibacterial application. Int. Nano Lett. 5(2), 85–92 (2015).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Ravikumar S, Gokulakrishnan R, Selvanathan K, Selvam S. Antibacterial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against ophthalmic pathogens. Int. J. Pharm. Res. Dev. 39(17), 122–127 (2011).Google Scholar
    • 12 Behera SS, Patra JK, Pramanik K, Panda N, Thatoi H. Characterization and evaluation of antibacterial activities of chemically synthesized iron oxide nanoparticles. World J. Nano Sci. Eng. 02(04), 196–200 (2012).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Eisele TC, Gabby KL. Review of reductive leaching of iron by anaerobic bacteria. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 35(2), 75–105 (2014).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Taylor EN, Webster TJ. The use of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for prosthetic biofilm prevention. Int. J. Nanomedicine 4, 145–152 (2009). •• Authors reported mechanisms of the magnetite nanoparticles (MNPs) antibacterial activity to prevent biofilm formation.Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Hajipour MJ, Fromm KM, Ashkarran AA et al. Erratum: antibacterial properties of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol. 30(10), 499–511 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Sutherland IW. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology 147(1), 3–9 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Esparza-Soto M, Westerhoff P. Biosorption of humic and fulvic acids to live activated sludge biomass. Water Res. 37(10), 2301–2310 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Selvakumar R, Aravindh S, Ashok AM, Balachandran YL. A facile synthesis of silver nanoparticle with SERS and antimicrobial activity using Bacillus subtilis exopolysaccharides. J. Exp. Nanosci. 9(10), 1075–1087 (2014).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Bandara HMHN, Nguyen D, Mogarala S, Osiñski M, Smyth HDC. Magnetic fields suppress Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and enhance ciprofloxacin activity. Biofouling 31(5), 443–457 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Geilich BM, Gelfat I, Sridhar S, van de Ven AL, Webster TJ. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-encapsulating polymersome nanocarriers for biofilm eradication. Biomaterials 119, 78–85 (2017).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 21 Anastasova EI, Prilepskii AY, Fakhardo AF, Drozdov AS, Vinogradov VV. Magnetite Nanocontainers: toward injectable highly magnetic materials for targeted drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(36), 30040–30044 (2018). • Demonstrated MNPs as a functional material for targeted drug delivery.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Prilepskii AY, Fakhardo AF, Drozdov AS et al. Urokinase-conjugated magnetite nanoparticles as a promising drug delivery system for targeted thrombolysis: synthesis and preclinical evaluation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(43), 36764–36775 (2018).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Drozdov AS, Vinogradov VV, Dudanov IP, Vinogradov VV. Leach-proof magnetic thrombolytic nanoparticles and coatings of enhanced activity. Sci. Rep. 6, 28119 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 24 Shabanova EM, Drozdov AS, Fakhardo AF, Dudanov IP, Kovalchuk MS, Vinogradov VV. Thrombin@Fe3O4nanoparticles for use as a hemostatic agent in internal bleeding. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 233 (2018).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 25 Shabanova EM, Drozdov AS, Ivanovski V, Suvorova II, Vinogradov VV. Collagenase@magnetite: proteolytic composite for magnetically targeted minimally invasive surgery. RSC Adv. 6(87), 84354–84362 (2016).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 26 Ranmadugala D, Ebrahiminezhad A, Manley-Harris M, Ghasemi Y, Berenjian A. The effect of iron oxide nanoparticles on Bacillus subtilis biofilm, growth and viability. Process Biochem. 62, 231–240 (2017).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 27 Leuba KD, Durmus NG, Taylor EN, Webster TJ. Short communication: carboxylate functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION) for the reduction of S. aureus growth post biofilm formation. Int. J. Nanomedicine 8, 731–736 (2013).MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28 Raftery TD, Kerscher P, Hart AE et al. Discrete nanoparticles induce loss of Legionella pneumophila biofilms from surfaces. Nanotoxicology 8(5), 477–484 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 29 Cotar A, Grumezescu A, Huang KC, Voicu G, Chifiriuc M, Radulescu R. Magnetite nanoparticles influence the efficacy of antibiotics against biofilm embedded Staphylococcus aureus cells. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 3(2), 559–565 (2013).CASGoogle Scholar
    • 30 Niemirowicz K, Durnaś B, Tokajuk G et al. Magnetic nanoparticles as a drug delivery system that enhance fungicidal activity of polyene antibiotics. Nanomedicine 12(8), 2395–2404 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 31 Grumezescu AM, Cotar AI, Andronescu E et al. In vitro activity of the new water-dispersible Fe3O4 @usnic acid nanostructure against planktonic and sessile bacterial cells. J. Nanoparticle Res. 15(7), 1766 (2013).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 32 Ma M, Wu Y, Zhou J, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Gu N. Size dependence of specific power absorption of Fe3O4 particles in AC magnetic field. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 268(1–2), 33–39 (2004).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 33 Maenosono S, Saita S. Theoretical assessment of FePt nanoparticles as heating elements for magnetic hyperthermia. IEEE Trans. Magn. 42(6), 1638–1642 (2006).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 34 Gazeau F, Lévy M, Wilhelm C. Optimizing magnetic nanoparticle design for nanothermotherapy. Nanomedicine 3(6), 831–844 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 35 Darwish MSA, Nguyen NHA, Ševců A, Stibor I, Smoukov SK. Dual-modality self-heating and antibacterial polymer-coated nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia. Mater. Sci. Eng. 63, 88–95 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 36 Fang CH, Tsai PI, Huang SW et al. Magnetic hyperthermia enhance the treatment efficacy of peri-implant osteomyelitis. BMC Infect. Dis. 17(1), 1–12 (2017). • Described biofilm destruction under influence of magnetic nanoparticles-induced hyperthermia effect.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 37 Chifiriuc MC, Grumezescu AM, Andronescu E et al. Water dispersible magnetite nanoparticles influence the efficacy of antibiotics against planktonic and biofilm embedded Enterococcus faecalis cells. Anaerobe 22, 14–19 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 38 Cotar AI, Grumezescu AM, Andronescu E, Voicu G. Nanotechnological solution for improving the antibiotic efficiency against biofilms developed by gram-negative bacterial strains. Lett. in Appl. NanoBioSci. 2(1), 97–104 (2013).Google Scholar
    • 39 Subbiahdoss G, Sharifi S, Grijpma DW et al. Magnetic targeting of surface-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles yields antibacterial efficacy against biofilms of gentamicin-resistant staphylococci. Acta Biomater. 8(6), 2047–2055 (2012). •• Highlighted possibilities of antibiotic-conjugated magnetite enhanced antibacterial properties under magnetic field activity.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 40 Ficai D, Grumezescu V, Fufă O et al. Antibiofilm coatings based on PLGA and nanostructured cefepime-functionalized magnetite. Nanomaterials 8(9), 633 (2018).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 41 Grumezescu AM, Cristescu R, Chifiriuc MC et al. Fabrication of magnetite-based core-shell coated nanoparticles with antibacterial properties. Biofabrication 7(1), 015014 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 42 Chifiriuc C, Grumezescu V, Grumezescu AM, Saviuc C, Lazăr V, Andronescu E. Hybrid magnetite nanoparticles/rosmarinus officinalis essential oil nanobiosystem with antibiofilm activity. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7(1), 209 (2012).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 43 Anghel I, Grumezescu AM, Andronescu E et al. Magnetite nanoparticles for functionalized textile dressing to prevent fungal biofilms development. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 7(1), 501 (2012).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 44 Chifiriuc C, Lazăr V, Bleotu C et al. Bacterial adherence to the cellular and inert substrate in the presence of CoFe2O4 and Fe3O4/oleic acid – core/shell. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures 6(1), 37–42 (2011).Google Scholar
    • 45 Saviuc C, Grumezescu AM, Chifiriuc CM et al. Hybrid nanosystem for stabilizing essential oils in biomedical applications. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures 6(4), 1657–1666 (2011). • Discussed oleic acid coated MNPs influence on biofilm architecture.Google Scholar
    • 46 Grumezescu V, Holban AM, Iordache F et al. MAPLE fabricated magnetite@eugenol and (3-hidroxybutyric acid-co-3-hidroxyvaleric acid)-polyvinyl alcohol microspheres coated surfaces with anti-microbial properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 306, 16–22 (2014).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 47 Niemirowicz K, Piktel E, Wilczewska AZ et al. Core-shell magnetic nanoparticles display synergistic antibacterial effects against and when combined with cathelicidin LL-37 or selected ceragenins. Int. J. Nanomed. 11, 5443–5455 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 48 Singh TG, Malhotra K, Sippy M, Dhiman S. Biomaterials and tissue engineering bulletin. Biomaterials 4(1-4), 81–90 (2017).Google Scholar